Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2008;1:95-102
Published online before print September 3, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.768176
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/2/95    most recent
CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.768176v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flesch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoepp, H.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flesch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoepp, H.-W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow CPR and emergency cardiac care
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrowRelated Article

Original Articles

Implementation of Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The Cologne Infarction Model Registry

Markus Flesch, MD, MSc; Jens Hagemeister, MD; Hans-Joerg Berger, MD; Annett Schiefer; Sylke Schynkowski; Martin Klein; Sassan Sahebdjami; Stephan vom Dahl, MD; Wolfgang Fehske, MD; Rudolf Mies, MD; Michael von Eiff, MD; Holger Pfaff, MD; Peter Frommolt, MSc and Hans-Wilhelm Hoepp, MD

From the Klinik III für Innere Medizin (M.F., J.H., S.S., M.K., H.-W.H.) and Krankenhaus Merheim, Lehrstuhl II für Innere Medizin (H.-J.B.), Universitaet zu Koeln, Cologne, Germany; St. Franziskus-Hospital, Cologne, Germany (A.S., S.S., S.v.D.); St. Vinzenz-Hospital, Cologne, Germany (W.F.); St. Antonius-Krankenhaus, Cologne, Germany (R.M.); Malteser-Krankenhaus St. Hildegardis, Cologne, Germany (M.v.E.); Zentrum für Versorgungsforschung der Universitaet zu Koeln, Cologne, Germany (H.P.); Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Epidemiologie der Universitaet zu Koeln, Cologne, Germany (P.F.).

Correspondence to Markus Flesch, MD, MSc, Klinik III für Innere Medizin der Universitaet zu Koeln, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany. E-mail markus.flesch{at}uni-koeln.de

Received January 23, 2008; accepted August 15, 2008.

Background— The aim of the Köln (Cologne) Infarction Model is to examine the feasibility of obligatory treatment of ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by first-line percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods and Results— The study was performed in Cologne with >1 million citizens, 5 coronary intervention centers, and 11 primary care hospitals. Twelve-lead ECG was available for all emergency medical service (EMS) teams. Partners guaranteed direct transfer of STEMI patients to a catheterization laboratory. A total of 519 patients treated within KIM in 2006 were included in the study. Of these, 24% presented at a primary care hospital, 11% presented directly at a coronary intervention center, 5% were transferred by EMS to primary care hospitals, and 60% were directly transferred by EMS to a catheterization laboratory. In 91% of cases, the catheterization laboratory was notified of the patient’s arrival in advance. False-positive ECG diagnosis of STEMI by EMS accounted for 6%. Median treatment times were as follows: from the start of symptoms to first medical contact, 120 minutes; phone to balloon, 70 minutes; and door to balloon, 49 minutes. Of all patients, 93% underwent angiography; 409 patients were treated by coronary intervention, and 24 underwent emergency coronary artery bypass graft. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow was obtained in 89%. In the hospitals, deaths and new myocardial infarctions were observed in 12.1% and in 1.9% of all patients, respectively.

Conclusion— The Cologne Infarction Model provides evidence for the feasibility of obligatory treatment of STEMI by primary coronary intervention in a metropolitan setting. Acceptance of treatment pathways allowed nearly all STEMI patients to undergo coronary angiography. ECG competence of EMS was excellent. Treatment times were within postulated limits. Results, including mortality, were within a high quality range.

Key Words: angioplasty • catheterization • emergency service • guideline • myocardial infarction


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article

Implementation of Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The Cologne Infarction Model Registry
Markus Flesch, Jens Hagemeister, Hans-Joerg Berger, Annett Schiefer, Sylke Schynkowski, Martin Klein, Sassan Sahebdjami, Stephan vom Dahl, Wolfgang Fehske, Rudolf Mies, Michael von Eiff, Holger Pfaff, Peter Frommolt, and Hans-Wilhelm Hoepp
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008 1: 95-102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097.
[Full Text] [PDF]