Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2009;2:302-308
Published online before print June 30, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847137
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/4/302    most recent
CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847137v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capodanno, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tamburino, C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Capodanno, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tamburino, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other

Original Articles

Usefulness of the SYNTAX Score for Predicting Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Davide Capodanno, MD; Maria Elena Di Salvo, MD; Glauco Cincotta, MD; Marco Miano, MD; Claudia Tamburino, MD and Corrado Tamburino, MD, PhD, FESC, FSCAI

From the Dipartimento di Cardiologia, Ospedale Ferrarotto, Università di Catania, Italy.

Correspondence to Davide Capodanno, MD, Department of Cardiology, Ferrarotto Hospital, University of Catania, via Citelli 6, 95124 Catania, Italy. E-mail dcapodanno{at}gmail.com

Received December 26, 2008; accepted May 28, 2009.

Background— The SYNTAX score (SXscore) has been proposed recently as a valuable tool to characterize the coronary vasculature prospectively with respect to the number of lesions and their functional impact, location, and complexity. However, the prognostic value of SXscores in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main artery has not been validated.

Methods and Results— We applied the SXscore in 255 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease and explored its performance with respect to their clinical outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relation between the SXscore and the incidence of cardiac mortality, the primary end point of the study, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). At 1 year, the SXscore significantly predicted the risk of cardiac death (hazard ratio, 1.12/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18; P<0.001) and MACE (hazard ratio, 1.59/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.48; P=0.043). After adjustment for potential confounders, a higher SXscore remained significantly associated with cardiac mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.26; P=0.003) and MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10; P=0.005). C-indexes for SXscores in terms of cardiac death and MACE were 0.83 and 0.64, respectively. Using classification tree analysis, discrimination levels of 34 and 37 were identified as the optimal cutoff to distinguish between patients at low and high risk of cardiac death and MACE, respectively.

Conclusions— The SXscore is a useful tool to predict cardiac mortality and MACE in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization of the left main coronary artery.

Key Words: SYNTAX score • left main coronary artery • percutaneous coronary intervention


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE