Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2009;2:339-347
Published online before print July 22, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.831800.108.831800
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/4/339    most recent
CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.831800.108.831800v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claessen, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Piek, J. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Claessen, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Piek, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC

Original Articles

Two-Year Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions

The SPIRIT II Trial

Bimmer E. Claessen, MD; Marcel A. Beijk, MD; Victor Legrand, MD; Witold Ruzyllo, MD; Antonio Manari, MD; Olivier Varenne, MD, PhD; Maarten J. Suttorp, MD, PhD; Jan G.P. Tijssen, PhD; Karine Miquel-Hebert, PhD; Susan Veldhof, RN; Jose P.S. Henriques, MD, PhD; Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD and Jan J. Piek, MD, PhD

From the Department of Cardiology (B.E.C., M.A.B., J.G.P.T., J.P.S.H., J.J.P.), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; C.H.U. de Liege Sart Tilman (V.L.), Liege, Belgium; National Institute of Cardiology in Warsaw (W.R.), Warsaw, Poland; Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Nuova (A.M.), Reggio Emilia, Italy; Hopital Cochin (O.V.), Paris, France; St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (M.J.S.), Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Abbott Vascular (K.M.-H., S.V.), Diegem, Belgium; and Thoraxcenter (P.W.S.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Bimmer E.P.M. Claessen, Department of Cardiology, Academic Medial Center, Meibergdreef 9 Room B2-223, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail B.E.Claessen{at}amc.uva.nl

Received October 28, 2008; accepted June 10, 2009.

Background— This article reports the 2-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in the randomized SPIRIT II trial.

Methods and Results— This was a prospective, single-blind clinical trial in which a total of 300 patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomized to either EES or PES in a 3:1 fashion. Clinical follow-up was planned at 2 years in all patients. A subset of 152 patients underwent serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analyses at 6 months and 2 years. After 2 years, target lesion failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) rates were 6.6% and 11% in EES and PES, respectively (P=0.31). At 6 months, a significant reduction in angiographic in-stent late loss and percentage volume obstruction measured by intravascular ultrasound was observed in the EES group. However, at 2-year follow-up, a late increased intimal hyperplasia growth after implantation of an EES was observed. There were no significant differences between EES and PES for in-stent late loss (EES, 0.33±0.37 mm versus PES, 0.34±0.34 mm; P=0.84) and percentage volume obstruction (EES, 5.18±6.22% versus PES, 5.80±6.31%; P=0.65) at 2 years. The incidence of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups (EES, 0.9%; PES, 1.4%).

Conclusions— Although the previously reported angiographic and clinical superiority of the EES has vanished over time, this report confirms and extends the previously demonstrated noninferiority in terms of in-stent late loss of the EES when compared with the PES up to 2-year follow-up. There were no significant differences between EES and PES in clinical, angiographic and intravascular ultrasound outcomes at 2 years.

Key Words: stents • angioplasty • IVUS


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE