Editorials |
From the Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York (C.E.R.) and Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology (I.K.), New York University Medical School, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Carlos E. Ruiz, MD, PhD, 130 E 77th St, 9th Floor Black Hall, New York, NY. E-mail cruiz@lenoxhill.net
Key Words: Editorials mitral valve regurgitation percutaneous mitral valve repair
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
During the past 3 decades, there have been major advances in our understanding of mitral valve function and its pathophysiology. This has led to the development of very creative and effective surgical techniques for the repair of the mitral valve.
Article see p 277
Currently, the clinical benefits of mitral regurgitation treatment by surgical mitral valve repair techniques are similar to those of mitral valve replacement. However, mortality is significantly lower after mitral valve repair than after valve replacement (0.2% versus 2.1%, P=0.001).1 Reoperation after mitral valve repair is rare (4.7%). Half of the small number of patients who require reoperation for valve-related problems undergo reoperation within 19 days of the original surgery. Of all reoperations, late reoperation occurs in 58%, at a median of 5.4 years. Mitral valve replacement was performed in 64% of all reoperations. Ten years after the second operation, the incidence of a third surgery was 7%.2 Despite these good results, mitral repair is performed in less than one third of the US patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.3,4
The surgical experience with mitral valve repair has shown that to achieve a successful and lasting result, mitral annuloplasty is required; this is especially true for repair of functional mitral regurgitation. Choosing the correct size and shape of the mitral annulus ring to be used for any given patient may have a significant impact on the outcome of the surgical procedure. The relative advantages of complete versus incomplete or rigid versus flexible rings5,6 are still highly debated
Related Article
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 277-284.
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |