Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2009;2:271-272
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.888586
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kronzon, I.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kronzon, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrowRelated Article

Editorials

The Wishful Thinking of Indirect Mitral Annuloplasty

Will It Ever Become a Reality?

Carlos E. Ruiz, MD, PhD and Itzhak Kronzon, MD

From the Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York (C.E.R.) and Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology (I.K.), New York University Medical School, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Carlos E. Ruiz, MD, PhD, 130 E 77th St, 9th Floor Black Hall, New York, NY. E-mail cruiz@lenoxhill.net

Key Words: Editorials • mitral valve regurgitation • percutaneous mitral valve repair


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

During the past 3 decades, there have been major advances in our understanding of mitral valve function and its pathophysiology. This has led to the development of very creative and effective surgical techniques for the repair of the mitral valve.

Article see p 277

Currently, the clinical benefits of mitral regurgitation treatment by surgical mitral valve repair techniques are similar to those of mitral valve replacement. However, mortality is significantly lower after mitral valve repair than after valve replacement (0.2% versus 2.1%, P=0.001).1 Reoperation after mitral valve repair is rare (4.7%). Half of the small number of patients who require reoperation for valve-related problems undergo reoperation within 19 days of the original surgery. Of all reoperations, late reoperation occurs in 58%, at a median of 5.4 years. Mitral valve replacement was performed in 64% of all reoperations. Ten years after the second operation, the incidence of a third surgery was 7%.2 Despite these good results, mitral repair is performed in less than one third of the US patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.3,4

The surgical experience with mitral valve repair has shown that to achieve a successful and lasting result, mitral annuloplasty is required; this is especially true for repair of functional mitral regurgitation. Choosing the correct size and shape of the mitral annulus ring to be used for any given patient may have a significant impact on the outcome of the surgical procedure. The relative advantages of complete versus incomplete or rigid versus flexible rings5,6 are still highly debated . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty: Initial Human Experience With a Novel Coronary Sinus Implant Device
Stefan Sack, Philipp Kahlert, Luc Bilodeau, Luc A. Pièrard, Patrizio Lancellotti, Victor Legrand, Jozef Bartunek, Marc Vanderheyden, Rainer Hoffmann, Patrick Schauerte, Takahiro Shiota, David S. Marks, Raimund Erbel, and Stephen G. Ellis
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 277-284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]