Editorial |
From the Department of Medicine (H.Q.L., J.-F.T.), Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; and Research Center, University of South Florida College of Nursing (K.E.K.), Tampa, Fla.
Correspondence to Jean-Francois Tanguay, MD, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, 5000 Belanger St (E), R-1600 Montreal, QC, Canada H1T 1C8. E-mail jean-francois.tanguay@icm-mhi.org
Key Words: Editorials myocardial infarction oxygen reperfusion statistics
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
In North America, every 25 seconds someone will have a coronary event and every minute someone will die of one.1 ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most dramatic manifestation of coronary artery disease and remains as one of the most important causes of mortality in the industrialized world. Prompt and successful reperfusion therapy (either pharmacologically with use of fibrinolytic therapy or mechanically with primary percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) is currently the cornerstone of acute management of STEMI to salvage ischemic myocardium and limit infarct size. Although undoubtedly beneficial, reperfusion of an occluded artery represents "a double-edge sword,"2 because restoration of epicardial coronary flow initiates a series of complex biochemical and molecular phenomena, which will ultimately mitigate myocardial healing. Thus, with reperfusion comes reperfusion injury.3
Article see p 366
Although the concept of cardioprotection (myocardial salvage) was first suggested by Braunwald,4 it was the seminal works of Reimer et al who crystallized the fact that there exists a window of opportunity to act to limit myocardial injury. They postulated that a "wavefront phenomenon" of cardiac necrosis, if left unchecked, would extend the infarct from the subendocardial region to the subepicardial region by using canine models of transiently or permanently occluded coronary arteries.5 Thereafter, over the course of 3 decades, mixed and disappointing results have plagued both experimental and clinical attempts to limit the deleterious effects of early reperfusion through either pharmacological (adenosine, calcium channel blockers, Na+/H+ exchange inhibitors, KATP channel openers, and glucose-insulin-potassium infusion) or nonpharmacological (therapeutic hypothermia) means.3,6
Related Article
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 366-375.
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |