| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Articles |
From the Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Correspondence to Werner Scholtz, MD, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Department of Cardiology, Georgstr. 11, D-32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. E-mail akohlstaedt{at}hdz-nrw.de
Received March 26, 2008; accepted February 11, 2009.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— The study population comprised 96 patients in the age group of 60 to 84 years. Percutaneous closure was performed effectively in all patients. Functional capacity according to New York Heart Association functional class and peak oxygen uptake (VO2max) in the cardiopulmonary exercise testing improved significantly after atrial septal defects closure, especially in patients with a pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio >2. Echocardiographic measurements of the right ventricular end-diastolic diameter showed a significant decrease. No device-associated complications were observed, but in 16 patients, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurred after device implantation.
Conclusions— Percutaneous atrial septal defects closure can be performed safely and with minimal risk even in elderly patients. They profit in terms of symptom reduction, improvement of exercise capacity, and right-heart remodeling.
Key Words: atrial septal defect left-to-right shunt interventional closure elderly patients exercise capacity atrial fibrillation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Editorial see p 83
Clinical Perspective see p 85
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Follow-Up
All patients were examined 3 months after percutaneous closure, including clinical and echocardiographic examination as well as a transesophageal contrast echocardiographic examination with valsava maneuver for detection of residual shunt or thrombus formation on the device. The subgroup of 35 patients with CPX before ASD closure also underwent this examination.
Implantation Procedure
Percutaneous closure of the ASD was performed from the femoral vein under local anesthesia and analgosedation, and fluoroscopic and multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. In patients with risk factors for coronary heart disease or angina pectoris, a coronary angiogram was performed before device closure. Shunt volume was determined by stepwise oxymetric measurements of superior and inferior vena cava, and pulmonary artery blood sample using the Fick principle and expressed as percent of pulmonary blood flow (%). Before entering the left atrium, 100 IE/kg body weight intravenous heparine was injected. Native and balloon sizing diameters ("stop-flow technique") of the ASD were measured in transesophageal echocardiographic examination and by fluoroscopy. Depending on the sizing diameter, the size of the device was chosen. A long sheath (9 to 12F) was positioned through the ASD in the left atrium near the left superior pulmonary vein. The device was introduced through this sheath and deployed under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. After confirming a secure position by pull-and-push maneuver, the device was released from the delivery system, and the final position was documented by transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy. Postinterventional treatment consisted of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid once daily for 6 months and 75 mg clopidogrel once daily for 2 months. For peri-interventional prophylaxis, the patients were given a single dose of cefazolin (1.5 g IV) during the catheter procedure. Standard endocarditis prophylaxis was recommended for 1 year.
Statement of Responsibility
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS statistical package (version 15.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). In the following sections, continuous variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation after checking for normality of distribution. Differences between baseline and follow-up were analyzed by the paired sample t test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation between changes in right and left ventricular diameter was analyzed with Pearson bivariate correlation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Follow-Up
Seven patients were lost to clinical follow-up. The 3-month follow-up after device closure (108±53 days), including transesophageal contrast echocardiography, demonstrated a tiny residual shunt through the device in 15 patients (16.9%). In the long-term follow-up (median, 33.6±31.2 months; range, 2.8 to 100.1 months), no device-associated complications, such as thrombus formation on the device, or device embolization or malposition were observed. NYHA functional class improved in 62 patients (69.7%). Three patients reported clinical worsening, and 24 patients reported no change in their functional capacity (Figure 1). Despite gender (21 women, 6 men), there were no other obvious differences between responders and nonresponders regarding age, shunt, PA pressures, or preinterventional VO2max. Seven (7.3%) patients reported of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation before device closure and were treated by oral anticoagulation. New paroxysmal AF occurred in 16 (17.9%) patients after device closure. Ten of them received new oral anticoagulation therapy; the remaining 6 had only a single short episode of AF within the first 3 months after ASD closure and no further recurrence and hence were not treated with phenprocoumon. Within the subgroup of the patients with paroxysmal AF, 3 reported deterioration and 8 no change in their NYHA functional class. Residual shunting did not influence the functional outcome; 11 patients improved in their NYHA functional class, 2 remained unchanged, and 2 worsened.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcome of percutaneous ASD closure in patients older than 60 years. Because only 4 patients of 96 showed complications due to the procedure, it can be concluded that this intervention can be performed safely and at low risk also in elderly patients. Decrease or even normalization of right ventricular size could be observed in the majority of patients within the first 3 months after ASD closure. Cardiac remodeling is an early postinterventional effect and appears during the first months after ASD closure.16,17 Significant improvement of NYHA functional class and exercise capacity in the majority of patients could be proved in this study. Especially patients with a Qp:Qs>2 seem to profit by this treatment. Minimal residual shunting after 3 months does not influence their outcome because further endothelialization with complete elimination of residual shunt can be expected in long term. However, the outcome was influenced if the patient developed paroxysmal AF. A significantly higher percentage of patients with paroxysmal AF after device closure reported of unchanged or deteriorated functional capacity. Although patients with chronic AF before ASD closure showed an improvement of the NYHA functional class after device closure, 68.7% of patients with new paroxysmal AF showed no change or even worsening of their NYHA functional class. The majority of the patients were symptomatic and improved in their functional capacity after ASD closure. Even in asymptomatic elderly patients, a device closure may induce positive right ventricular remodeling and hence should be performed in this age group as well.
ASD closure with abolishment of left-to-right shunt leads to augmented left ventricular filling by increased left ventricular preload and therefore to improved left ventricular stroke volume.18 The rise in left ventricular stroke volume may explain the increase in VO2max and increase of functional capacity. Especially in this age group in which impaired diastolic function is common, this may explain the functional improvement.
Potential risk of transient pulmonary congestion was described especially in elderly patients with impaired diastolic function after ASD closure.19 Pathophysiologically, this phenomenon can be explained with augmented left atrial pressure after abolishment of left-to-right shunting by ASD closure. In our series, 2 patients developed mild symptoms of pulmonary congestion directly after implantation. Both improved shortly after diuretic treatment and presented with stable functional status in long-term follow-up.
In general, the results of this study confirm other published clinical observations, with few patients undergoing surgical repair9,10 or smaller study groups after device closure.13 In comparison to surgical ASD treatment, patients functional recovery was faster in the interventional group,16 probably because of the effects of thoracotomy and heart lung machine. Especially, older patients were at a higher risk during surgery and often have delayed recovery.
Hence, interventional closure of secundum-type atrial defects with moderate or severe left-to-right shunt can be recommended in patients older than 60 years, with good functional results in the majority of patients.
Study Limitations
Potential limitation may occur by missing CPX data during follow-up in some patients and lacking comparison with surgically treated patients.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. King TD, Thompson SL, Steiner C, Mills NL. Secundum atrial septal defect. Nonoperative closure during cardiac catheterization. JAMA. 1976; 235: 2506–2509.
3. Spies C, Timmermanns I, Schräder R. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects in adults with the Amplatzer septal occluder: intermediate and long-term results. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 96: 340–346.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Masura J, Gavora P, Podnar T. Long-term outcome of transcatheter secundum-type atrial septal defect closure using Amplatzer septal occluders. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 505–507.
5. Schoen SP, Kittner T, Bohl S, Braun MU, Simonis G, Schmeisser A, Strasser RH. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects improves right ventricular volume, mass, function, pulmonary pressure, and functional class: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Heart. 2006; 92: 821–826.
6. Helber U, Baumann R, Seboldt H, Reinhard U, Hoffmeister HM. Atrial septal defect in adults: cardiopulmonary exercise capacity before and 4 months and 10 years after defect closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1345–1350.[Abstract]
7. Salehian O, Horlick E, Schwerzmann M, Haberer K, McLaughlin P, Siu SC, Webb G, Therrien J. Improvements in cardiac form and function after transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 499–504.
8. Brochu MC, Baril JF, Dore A, Juneau M, De Guise P, Mercier LA. Improvements in exercise capacity in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic adults after atrial septal defect percutaneous closure. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1821–1826.
9. Nasrallah AT, Hall RJ, Garcia E, Leachman RD, Cooley DA. Surgical repair of atrial septal defect in patients over 60 years of age. Long-term results. Circulation. 1976; 53: 329–331.
10. Miyaji K, Furuse A, Tanaka O, Kubota H, Ono M, Kawauchi M. Surgical repair for atrial septal defect in patients over 70 years of age. Jpn Heart J. 1997; 38: 677–684.[Medline]
11. Patel A, Lopez K, Banerjee A, Joseph A, Cao QL, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults > or =40 years of age: immediate and follow-up results. J Interv Cardiol. 2007; 20: 82–88.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Elshershari H, Cao QL, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects in patients older than 60 years of age: immediate and follow-up results. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008; 20: 173–176.[Medline]
13. Swan L, Varma C, Yip J, Warr M, Webb G, Benson L, McLaughlin P. Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects in the elderly: technical considerations and short-term outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2006; 107: 207–210.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Yalonetsky S, Lorber A. Percutaneous closure of a secundum atrial septal defect in elderly patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007; 19: 510–512.[Medline]
15. American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 167: 211–277.
16. Thilén U, Persson S. Closure of atrial septal defect in adult. Cardiac remodeling is an early event. Int J Cardiol. 2006; 108: 370–375.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Bettencourt N, Salomé N, Carneiro F, Gonçalves M, Ribeiro J, Braga JP, Fonseca C, Correia DM, Vouga L, Ribeiro VG. Atrial septal closure in adults: surgery versus amplatzer—comparison of results. Rev Port Cardiol. 2003; 22: 1203–1211.[Medline]
18. Pascooot M, Santoro G, Caso P, Cerrato F, Caso I, Caputo S, Bigazzi MC, D'Andrea A, Russo MG, Calabrò R. Global and regional left ventricular function in patients undergoing transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96: 439–442.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Ewert P, Berger F, Nagdyman N, Kretschmar O, Dittrich S, Abdul-Khaliq H, Lange PE. Masked left ventricular restriction in elderly patients with atrial septal defects: a contraindication for closure? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001; 52: 177–180.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related Articles
This article has been cited by other articles:
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This clinical study on interventional closure of atrial septal defects in patients older than 60 years could demonstrate relief of symptoms, improvement of functional capacity, and positive right-heart remodeling in the echocardiographic analysis. Especially in patients with high shunt volume, the exercise capacity improved significantly. This procedure can be performed with minimal acute and long-term risk, and the authors recommend interventional atrial septal defects closure in this age group.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 83-84.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 85-89.
![]() |
G. Martucci and M. Landzberg Not Just Big Kids: Closing Atrial Septal Defects in Adults Older Than 60 Years Circ Cardiovasc Interv, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 83 - 84. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |