Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 6, 2009

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2009
Published online before print March 6, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/3/159    most recent
CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Verta, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gray, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Verta, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting
Right arrowRelated Article

Original Article

30-Day Outcomes for Carotid Artery Stenting in 6,320 Patients From Two Prospective, Multicenter, High Surgical Risk Registries

William A. Gray1,4; Seemant Chaturvedi2 and Patrick Verta3

1 Columbia University;
2 Wayne State University;
3 Abbott Vascular, Endovascular Global Clinical Science

4 E-mail: wgray{at}crf.org

Background—The American Heart Association (AHA) established guidelines for acceptable 30-day death and stroke rates for patients with severe carotid disease undergoing standard risk carotid endarterectomy: <3% for asymptomatic lesions and <6% for symptomatic lesions. To date, carotid stenting (CAS) has not demonstrated these outcomes in multicenter, prospective assessments of high surgical risk patients.

Methods and Results—Data from two prospective, multicenter (280 United States sites, 672 operators), post-market surveillance studies in high-surgical risk patients were analyzed: 2145 patients from EXACT (EX) and 4175 patients from CAPTURE 2 (C2). Both studies had pre- and post-procedure neurologic evaluation and independent adjudication of neurologic events. The overall 30-day death and stroke rate was 4.1% [95% CI: 3.3%, 5.0%] for EX and 3.4% [95% CI: 2.9%, 4.0%] for C2. In the population comparable to AHA guidelines (<80 years), the combined 30-day death and stroke rate was 5.3% [95% CI: 3.6%, 7.4%] for symptomatic patients and 2.9% [95% CI: 2.4%, 3.4%] for asymptomatic patients, independent of unfavorable risk factors (anatomic or physiologic); in patients ≥80 years, this rate was 10.5% [95% CI: 6.3%, 16.0%] and 4.4% [95% CI: 3.3%, 5.7%], respectively. In subjects with anatomic features unfavorable for surgery, the 30-day death and stroke rates were 1.7% [95% CI: 0.0%, 8.9%] and 2.7% [95% CI: 1.3%, 4.9%] for symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts respectively, independent of age.

Conclusions—Outcomes for CAS in non-octogenarian high-surgical risk patients have improved since the pivotal FDA approval trials; they achieved AHA standards in both symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions.

Key Words: carotid arteries • stenosis • stents • stroke • outcomes

Author contributions: Submitted on behalf of the investigators and the Executive Committees of Abbott Vascular.


Related Article

The Cart and The Horse: The Advancing Technology of Carotid Artery Stenting
Larry B. Goldstein
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 153-155. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Roffi, D. Mukherjee, and D. G. Clair
Carotid artery stenting vs. endarterectomy
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2693 - 2704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]