| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Article |
1 Columbia University;
2 Wayne State University;
3 Abbott Vascular, Endovascular Global Clinical Science
4 E-mail: wgray{at}crf.org
Background—The American Heart Association (AHA) established guidelines for acceptable 30-day death and stroke rates for patients with severe carotid disease undergoing standard risk carotid endarterectomy: <3% for asymptomatic lesions and <6% for symptomatic lesions. To date, carotid stenting (CAS) has not demonstrated these outcomes in multicenter, prospective assessments of high surgical risk patients.
Methods and Results—Data from two prospective, multicenter (280 United States sites, 672 operators), post-market surveillance studies in high-surgical risk patients were analyzed: 2145 patients from EXACT (EX) and 4175 patients from CAPTURE 2 (C2). Both studies had pre- and post-procedure neurologic evaluation and independent adjudication of neurologic events. The overall 30-day death and stroke rate was 4.1% [95% CI: 3.3%, 5.0%] for EX and 3.4% [95% CI: 2.9%, 4.0%] for C2. In the population comparable to AHA guidelines (<80 years), the combined 30-day death and stroke rate was 5.3% [95% CI: 3.6%, 7.4%] for symptomatic patients and 2.9% [95% CI: 2.4%, 3.4%] for asymptomatic patients, independent of unfavorable risk factors (anatomic or physiologic); in patients
80 years, this rate was 10.5% [95% CI: 6.3%, 16.0%] and 4.4% [95% CI: 3.3%, 5.7%], respectively. In subjects with anatomic features unfavorable for surgery, the 30-day death and stroke rates were 1.7% [95% CI: 0.0%, 8.9%] and 2.7% [95% CI: 1.3%, 4.9%] for symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts respectively, independent of age.
Conclusions—Outcomes for CAS in non-octogenarian high-surgical risk patients have improved since the pivotal FDA approval trials; they achieved AHA standards in both symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions.
Key Words: carotid arteries stenosis stents stroke outcomes
Author contributions: Submitted on behalf of the investigators and the Executive Committees of Abbott Vascular.
Related Article
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 153-155.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Roffi, D. Mukherjee, and D. G. Clair Carotid artery stenting vs. endarterectomy Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2693 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |