| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Article |
1 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA;
2 University of South Florida,Tampa, FL;
3 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA;
4 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;
5 New York University Medical Center, New York, NY;
6 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA;
7 Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA;
8 Brown University, Providence, RI
9 E-mail: venkitachalaml{at}upmc.edu
Background—Percutaneous coronary intervention has undergone rapid progress both in technology and adjunct therapy. However, documentation of long-term temporal trends in relation to contemporary practice is lacking.
Methods and Results—We analyzed PCI use and outcomes in 8976 consecutive patients in the multicenter NHLBI-sponsored 1985-86 PTCA and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries waves [wave 1: 1997-98, bare metal stents; wave 2: 1999, uniform use of stents; wave 3: 2001-02, brachytherapy; waves 4 and 5: 2004-2006,drug-eluting stents]. Patients undergoing PCI in the recent waves were older and more often reported comorbidities than those in the balloon era. PCI was more often performed for acute coronary syndromes and, in spite of the greater disease burden, was more often selective. Procedural success was achieved and maintained more often in the stent era. Significant reductions were observed in in-hospital rates (%) of myocardial infarction (PTCA Registry: 4.9, wave 1: 2.7, wave 2: 2.8, wave 3: 1.9, wave 4: 2.6, wave 5: 2, Ptrend:<0.001) and emergency CABG (PTCA Registry: 3.7, wave 1: 0.4, wave 2: 0.4, wave 3: 0.3, wave 4: 0.4, wave 5: 0, Ptrend:<0.001). Compared to the PTCA Registry, risk for repeat revascularization (31-365 days following index PCI) was significantly lower in the Dynamic waves (adjusted hazard ratio, wave 1: 0.72, wave 2: 0.51, wave 3: 0.51, wave 4: 0.30, wave 5: 0.36; P< 0.05 for all).
Conclusion—Percutaneous interventions, in the last two decades, has evolved to include more urgent, comorbid cases, yet achieving high success rates with significantly reduced need for repeat revascularization.
Key Words: angioplasty registries stents temporal trends
Related Articles
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 1-3.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 2: 6-13.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. B. Lindsey, S. P. Marso, M. Pencina, J. M. Stolker, K. F. Kennedy, C. Rihal, G. Barsness, R. N. Piana, S. L. Goldberg, D. E. Cutlip, et al. Prognostic Impact of Periprocedural Bleeding and Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unselected Patients: Results From the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) Registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., November 1, 2009; 2(11): 1074 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |