Methods and Results—Patients who were discharged after PCI for STEMI between January 1, 2003, and December 12, 2006, in P-PCI centers (hospitals with no coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and PCI only for patients with STEMI) were propensity matched with patients in full service centers, and mortality and subsequent revascularization rates were compared. For patients undergoing PCI, there were no differences for in-hospital/30-day mortality (2.3% for P-PCI centers versus 1.9% for full service centers [P=0.40]), emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery immediately after PCI (0.06% versus 0.35%, P=0.06), 3-year mortality (7.1% versus 5.9%, P=0.07), or 3-year subsequent revascularization (23.8% versus 21.5%, P=0.52). P-PCI centers had a lower same/next day coronary artery bypass graft rate (0.23% versus 0.69%, P=0.046) and higher repeat target vessel PCI rates (12.1% versus 9.0%, P=0.003). For patients with STEMI who did not undergo PCI, P-PCI centers had higher in-hospital mortality (28.5% versus 22.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.75).
Conclusions—No differences between P-PCI centers and full service centers were found in in-hospital/30-day mortality, the need for emergency surgery, 3-year mortality or subsequent revascularization, but P-PCI centers had higher repeat target vessel PCI rates and higher mortality rates for patients who did not undergo PCI. P-PCI centers should be monitored closely, including the monitoring of patients with STEMI who did not undergo PCI.
]]>Methods and Results—Baseline blood samples were available on 1468 CREDO (Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation) patients for hs-CRP testing and 1096 patients for PAPP-A testing. The 1-year primary end point was the composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Patients in the highest 2 tertiles of hs-CRP had more events compared with the lowest tertile (11.4% versus 6.4%, P=0.003). Treatment with clopidogrel reduced the 1-year composite end point for patients in the highest 2 tertiles of hs-CRP (9.1% clopidogrel versus 13.5% placebo, P=0.04) but not in the lowest tertile. Elevated PAPP-A levels were associated with a trend toward more events at 1 year that did not reach statistical significance. Patients in the highest 2 tertiles of PAPP-A randomized to clopidogrel had fewer events (7.3% clopidogrel versus 13.1% placebo, P=0.01), but no benefit was seen in the lowest tertile. A 46% risk reduction with randomization to clopidogrel was seen in patients in the highest 2 tertiles of both biomarkers (8.7% versus 16.2%, P=0.02).
Conclusions—Patients undergoing nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention who have elevated hs-CRP and PAPP-A have an increased incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. The clinical benefit of adding clopidogrel to aspirin seems greater in those with increased levels of these inflammatory biomarkers.
]]>Methods and Results—Of 390 consecutive computed tomography angiographies reviewed, 56 met the inclusion criteria. Mean age of the patients was 68.9±13.1 years (26.8% men). The dimensions of the CS/GCV and the distance between this structure and the MA were measured at 10 different spatial points along the CS/GCV trajectory and at 3 different time points along the cardiac cycle (phases 0%, 40%, and 75% of the RR interval) by using curved multiplanar reconstruction technique. The CS/GCV was larger in phase 40% than in phase 75% and was smallest in phase 0% (P<0.001). The distance between the CS/GCV and the MA was longest in phase 40% and shortest in phase 0% (P=.013). The diameter of the MA was measured in oblique 2- and 4-chamber reconstructions, being largest in phase 0% and smallest in phase 40% (P=.019). A coronary artery traversed between the CS/GCV and the MA in 85.7% of the patients.
Conclusions—This study demonstrated dynamic changes in the relationship between the CS/GCV and the MA and also that coronary arteries frequently traverse between both structures. Whether these findings are of clinical relevance for patients undergoing percutaneous mitral annuloplasty needs to be prospectively evaluated.
]]>Methods and Results—We initiated a prospective randomized controlled trial. One hundred and ten patients with bifurcations were randomly assigned to 2 arms: Stenting of the main branch (MB, Taxus-stent, paclitaxel-eluting stents) and mandatory side branch (SB) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; kissing balloons) with provisional SB stenting (therapy A), or stenting of the MB (paclitaxel-eluting stents) with provisional SB-PCI only when the SB had a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <2 (therapy B). The primary end point was target lesion revascularization. The mean ages were 66.8 years (A) versus 65.1 years (B, P=0.4), 71.4% (A) versus 77.8% were men (P=0.4), patients with diabetes were present in 25.0% versus 25.9% (P=0.9). The MB was left anterior descending artery in 80.4% versus 81.5% (A versus B, P=0.9). The SB-PCI and kissing balloon-PCI were performed according to the study protocol in 82.1%/73.2% versus 16.7%/13.0% (P<0.05 for both), while changing of the intended therapy was necessary in 17.9% versus 16.7% (A versus B, P=0.9). A final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3 (MB) was reached in all patients (groups A and B), final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3 (SB) was observed in 96.4% versus 88.9% (A versus B, P=0.3). Radiation time (min) and contrast medium (mL) were 14.2/210 (group A) versus 7.8/151.6 (group B; P for both <0.05). Six month - follow up: major adverse cardiac events was 23.2% (A) versus 24.1% (B, P=0.9), target lesion revascularization was 17.9% (A) versus 14.8% (B, P=0.7), and late lumen loss (MB) was 0.2 mm (A) versus 0.3 mm (B, P=0.5). In group B, no PCI of the SB was done during follow up.
Conclusions—A simple strategy using paclitaxel-eluting stents with only provisional SB-PCI may be of equal value to a more complex strategy with mandatory SB-PCI.
Clinical Trial Registration—URL:
Methods and Results—From a prospective registry of consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization at our center, 9823 patients who received either a collagen plug-based (Angio-Seal) or a suture-based (Perclose) VCD were selected for the study. VCD failure was defined as unsuccessful deployment or failure to achieve hemostasis. Major vascular complication was defined as any retroperitoneal hemorrhage, limb ischemia, or any surgical repair. Minor vascular complication was defined as any groin bleeding, hematoma (≥5 cm), pseudoaneurysm, or arteriovenous fistula. Any vascular complication was defined as either a major or minor vascular complication. Among the 9823 patients in the study, VCD failed in 268 patients (2.7%; 2.3% diagnostic versus 3.0% percutaneous coronary intervention; P=0.029). Patients with VCD failure had significantly increased risk of any (6.7% versus 1.4%; P<0.0001), major (1.9% versus 0.6%; P=0.006), or minor (6.0% versus 1.1%; P<0.0001) vascular complication compared with the group with successful deployment of VCD. The increased risk of vascular complication was unchanged in a propensity score-matched cohort.
Conclusions—In contemporary practice, VCD failure is rare, but when it does fail, it is associated with a significant increase in the risk of vascular complications. Patients with VCD failure should be closely monitored.
]]>Methods and Results—A total of 167 patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents for stable angina (322 lesions) were enrolled. They were divided into tertiles according to serum CRP levels. We analyzed the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization after PCI as well as quantitative coronary angiographic data. The mean follow-up was 31 months (SD, 14). Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 11 patients (19.6%) of the lowest tertile, in 22 patients (39.3%) of the middle tertile, and in 28 patients (50.9%) of the highest tertile during follow-up period (P=0.0009). There was a progressive increase in neointimal growth after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation during follow-up because preprocedural CRP levels were higher, despite similar angiographic data just after PCI. Angiographic restenosis at 6 to 8 months after PCI was seen in 10.6% in the lowest tertile, 17.9% in the middle tertile, and 32.0% in the highest tertile (P=0.0007).
Conclusions—Increased preprocedural serum CRP levels would predict higher major adverse cardiac events and restenosis rates after sirolimus-eluting stents implantation in patients on hemodialysis.
]]>Methods and Results—Prospective registry of diabetic patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enrolled in a diabetic gene and biomarker banking registry. Plaque composition in the most diseased 10-mm segment of a single coronary artery was assessed using IVUS virtual histology and was classified by phenotype as IVUS-defined adaptive intimal thickening, pathological intimal thickening, TCFA, fibroatheroma, or fibrocalcific. Patients (n=54) were stratified by duration of diabetes (<10 or ≥10 years). Patients with diabetes ≥10 years were older, less likely to have a history of tobacco use, had higher total cholesterol levels, and were more likely to be treated with insulin compared with patients with diabetes <10 years. Longer duration of diabetes was associated with greater plaque burden in the most diseased 10-mm segment (60.4% [53.4% to 66.8%] versus 50.2% [47.7% to 58.4%], P=0.008). The proportion of IVUS-defined TCFA in the ≥10-year group was greater than the <10-year group (54.4% [11.6% to 77.5%] versus 10.8% [0.0% to 26.1%], P=0.009). This association persisted after adjustment for multiple comparisons, clinical characteristics, and diabetes treatment.
Conclusions—In this cohort, longer duration of diabetes was associated with IVUS-defined TCFA, a plaque phenotype associated with risk of rupture and coronary heart disease events.
Clinical Trial Registration—URL: