<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org">
<title>Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions recent issues</title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org</link>
<description>Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1941-7632</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1941-7640</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/e3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/e4?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/401?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/438?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/455?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/463?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/475?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/294?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/302?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/309?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/330?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/348?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/352?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/361?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/156?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/159?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/167?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/178?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/188?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/230?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/264?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/e1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/e2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/90?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/97?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/133?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/149?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions</title>
<url>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/e3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Letter by Alfonso et al Regarding Article, "Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis" [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/e3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfonso, F., Dutary, J., Zakhem, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.889063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Letter by Alfonso et al Regarding Article, "Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis" [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e3</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/e4?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis" [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/e4?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, S.-J., Kim, Y.-H., Kang, S.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.901819</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis" [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Superoxygen Therapy: A Bayesian Breath of Fresh Air for Myocardial Salvage [Editorial]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ly, H. Q., Kip, K. E., Tanguay, J.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.908095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Superoxygen Therapy: A Bayesian Breath of Fresh Air for Myocardial Salvage [Editorial]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Supersaturated Oxygen Delivery on Infarct Size After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Myocardial salvage is often suboptimal after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Posthoc subgroup analysis from a previous trial (AMIHOT I) suggested that intracoronary delivery of supersaturated oxygen (SSO<SUB>2</SUB>) may reduce infarct size in patients with large ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated early.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> A prospective, multicenter trial was performed in which 301 patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 hours of symptom onset were randomized to a 90-minute intracoronary SSO<SUB>2</SUB> infusion in the left anterior descending artery infarct territory (n=222) or control (n=79). The primary efficacy measure was infarct size in the intention-to-treat population (powered for superiority), and the primary safety measure was composite major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations (powered for noninferiority), with Bayesian hierarchical modeling used to allow partial pooling of evidence from AMIHOT I. Among 281 randomized patients with tc-99m-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography data in AMIHOT II, median (interquartile range) infarct size was 26.5% (8.5%, 44%) with control compared with 20% (6%, 37%) after SSO<SUB>2</SUB>. The pooled adjusted infarct size was 25% (7%, 42%) with control compared with 18.5% (3.5%, 34.5%) after SSO<SUB>2</SUB> (<I>P</I><SUB>Wilcoxon</SUB>=0.02; Bayesian posterior probability of superiority, 96.9%). The Bayesian pooled 30-day mean (&plusmn;SE) rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were 5.0&plusmn;1.4% for control and 5.9&plusmn;1.4% for SSO<SUB>2</SUB> by intention-to-treat, and 5.1&plusmn;1.5% for control and 4.7&plusmn;1.5% for SSO<SUB>2</SUB> by per-protocol analysis (posterior probability of noninferiority, 99.5% and 99.9%, respectively).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Among patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 hours of symptom onset, infusion of SSO<SUB>2</SUB> into the left anterior descending artery infarct territory results in a significant reduction in infarct size with noninferior rates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days.</p>
<p><b><I>Clinical Trial Registration&mdash;</I></b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00175058</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stone, G. W., Martin, J. L., de Boer, M.-J., Margheri, M., Bramucci, E., Blankenship, J. C., Metzger, D. C., Gibbons, R. J., Lindsay, B. S., Weiner, B. H., Lansky, A. J., Krucoff, M. W., Fahy, M., Boscardin, W. J., for the AMIHOT-II Trial Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute myocardial infarction, Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.840066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Supersaturated Oxygen Delivery on Infarct Size After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>375</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Thrombus Aspiration on Myocardial Tissue Reperfusion and Left Ventricular Functional Recovery and Remodeling After Primary Angioplasty [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Failure to achieve myocardial reperfusion often occurs during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. We hypothesized that manual thrombus aspiration during primary PCI would favorably influence tissue-level myocardial perfusion and left ventricular (LV) functional recovery and remodeling.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We prospectively randomized 111 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to either standard or thrombus-aspiration PCI. Primary end point of the study was postprocedural incidence of ST-segment resolution &ge;70%. Secondary end points included Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion grade &ge;2, the combination of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade &ge;2 and ST-segment resolution &ge;70%, post-PCI TIMI grade 3 flow, corrected TIMI frame count, myocardial contrast echocardiography score index, the absence of persistent ST-segment deviation, and time course of wall-motion score index, LV ejection fraction, and LV volume in the 2 groups. The incidence of ST-segment resolution &ge;70% was 71% and 39% in the thrombus-aspiration and standard PCI groups, respectively (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.3; <I>P</I>=0.001). TIMI myocardial perfusion grade &ge;2 was attained in 93% in the thrombus-aspiration group compared with 71% in the standard PCI group (<I>P</I>=0.006). The percentage of patients with ST-segment resolution &ge;70% and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade &ge;2 was significantly greater in the thrombus-aspiration group compared with the standard PCI group (69% versus 36%, <I>P</I>=0.0006). Myocardial contrast echocardiography score index was significantly higher in the thrombus-aspiration group compared with the standard PCI group (0.86&plusmn;0.20 versus 0.65&plusmn;0.31; <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001). A significantly greater improvement in LV ejection fraction and in wall-motion score index from baseline to 6-month follow-up was observed in the thrombus-aspiration group compared with the standard PCI group (LV ejection fraction from 48&plusmn;6% to 55&plusmn;6% versus 48.7&plusmn;7% to 49&plusmn;8%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; wall-motion score index from 1.59&plusmn;0.13 to 1.31&plusmn;0.19 versus 1.64&plusmn;0.20 to 1.51&plusmn;0.26, <I>P</I>=0.008). Twelve patients (11%) developed LV remodeling at 6 months, 2 (4%) in the thrombus-aspiration group and 10 (18%) in the standard PCI group (<I>P</I>=0.02).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Manual thrombus aspiration in the setting of primary PCI improves myocardial tissue-level perfusion as well as LV functional recovery and remodeling.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liistro, F., Grotti, S., Angioli, P., Falsini, G., Ducci, K., Baldassarre, S., Sabini, A., Brandini, R., Capati, E., Bolognese, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute myocardial infarction, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.852665</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Thrombus Aspiration on Myocardial Tissue Reperfusion and Left Ventricular Functional Recovery and Remodeling After Primary Angioplasty [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>383</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Results in Chronic Endothelial Dysfunction in the Infarct-Related Coronary Artery [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation aggravated endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in infarct-related coronary arteries.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> This study examined the effect of SES implantation on the duration of reperfusion-induced endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in infarct-related coronary arteries and on postinfarct left ventricular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients with a first AMI due to occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery and successful reperfusion using SES (n=15) or bare metal stents (BMS; n=18) were examined. The vasomotor response of the left anterior descending coronary artery to acetylcholine and left ventriculography were examined 2 weeks and 6 months after AMI. At 6 months after AMI, the impairment of epicardial coronary artery dilation and coronary blood flow increase in response to acetylcholine was recovered from 2 weeks after AMI in BMS-treated patients, whereas the responses of SES-treated patients improved but remained impaired compared with BMS-treated patients (% increase in blood flow, 77&plusmn;12% in SES versus 116&plusmn;15% in BMS at 10 &micro;g/min of acetylcholine, <I>P</I>&lt;0.01). Left ventricular regional wall dysfunction in the left anterior descending coronary artery territory improved from 2 weeks to 6 months after AMI in BMS-treated patients but not in SES-treated patients (% improvement of average SD/chord, 6% in SES versus 19% in BMS, <I>P</I>&lt;0.05), although left ventricular global ejection fraction was similar between the groups at any time points.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> SES implantation may delay recovery of reperfusion-induced endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in infarct-related coronary arteries and left ventricular regional dysfunction for at least 6 months after AMI.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obata, J.-e., Nakamura, T., Kitta, Y., Kodama, Y., Sano, K., Kawabata, K.-I., Saitoh, Y., Fujioka, D., Kobayashi, T., Yano, T., Watanabe, Y., Watanabe, K., Kugiyama, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.821371</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Results in Chronic Endothelial Dysfunction in the Infarct-Related Coronary Artery [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Prognosis in an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Population Treated With Routine Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From Clinical Trial to Real-Life Experience [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> We sought to describe the long-term prognosis after routine primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in a contemporary consecutive population of patients with presumed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, compare it with similar results from the landmark DANAMI-2 trial, and to identify a possible impact of time of presentation and referral pattern.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Long-term prognosis in 1019 presumed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, treated according to modern routine pPCI during the year 2004, was analyzed and compared with similar data from the DANAMI-2 trial. Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of patient presentation to the angioplasty center during "off hours" (4 <scp>pm</scp> to 8 <scp>am</scp> plus weekends and holidays) and the impact of being referred from noninvasive hospitals. At 3 years, 20.4% in the routinely treated population versus 19.6% in the DANAMI-2 trial reached the combined end point of death, reinfarction, or stroke (<I>P</I>=0.68), whereas the all-cause mortality was 13.0% and 13.7%, respectively (<I>P</I>=0.65). Patients admitted during off hours had the same risk of reaching the combined end point of death, reinfarction, or stroke compared with patients admitted during office hours (hazards ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.5; <I>P</I>=0.81). Door-to-balloon times of less than 90 minutes were achieved in 60% among patients admitted directly to an invasive center but only in 40% among transferred patients (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001). Despite this difference, no difference in unadjusted or adjusted long-term prognosis was found between the 2 groups.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> This study shows that ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with contemporary routine pPCI achieve a similar long-term prognosis as patients in the landmark randomized pPCI trial (DANAMI-2). Furthermore, the long-term prognosis was the same regardless of whether the pPCI was performed during off hours or office hours. Thus, pPCI including transportation of patients from noninvasive centers can be applied successfully in a real-life population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedersen, S., Galatius, S., Mogelvang, R., Davidsen, U., Galloe, A., Abildstrom, S. Z., Abildgaard, U., Hansen, P. R., Bech, J., Iversen, A., Jorgensen, E., Kelbaek, H., Saunamaki, K., Madsen, J. K., Jensen, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Acute myocardial infarction, Epidemiology, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.845636</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Prognosis in an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Population Treated With Routine Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From Clinical Trial to Real-Life Experience [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>400</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/401?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stent Thrombosis in Sweden: A Report From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/401?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> The objective was to evaluate the role of risk factors and stent type for stent thrombosis (ST) using a large real world registry.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We evaluated all consecutive coronary stent implantations in Sweden from May 1, 2005, to June 30, 2007. All cases of ST, documented in the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty registry until September 21, 2008, were analyzed. ST was registered in 882 of 73 798 stents. Acute coronary syndromes, insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, smoking, previous coronary intervention, warfarin treatment, small stent diameter, and stenting in restenotic, complex, or bypass graft lesions had the strongest association with ST in the multivariable statistical model. There were considerable differences in the frequency of ST between different stent brands. The overall risk of ST was lower in drug-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents (adjusted risk ratio, 0.79; 99% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). However, from 6 months after stent implantation and onward, the risk for ST was higher in drug-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents (adjusted risk ratio, 2.02; 99% CI, 1.30 to 3.14).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> ST is a multifactor disease, and the incidence varies considerably between patients based on clinical, vessel, and stent characteristics. For drug-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents, the risk pattern was biphasic; initially, bare metal stents demonstrated a higher risk of ST; whereas after the first months, ST risk was higher with drug-eluting stents. Our findings highlight the need for prospective randomized studies with head-to-head comparisons between different stents.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lagerqvist, B., Carlsson, J., Frobert, O., Lindback, J., Schersten, F., Stenestrand, U., James, S. K., for the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.844985</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stent Thrombosis in Sweden: A Report From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>408</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>401</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/409?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Double Versus Single Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/409?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Several trials have addressed whether bifurcation lesions require stenting of both the main vessel and side branch, but uncertainty remains on the benefits of such double versus single stenting of the main vessel only.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We have conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials including patients with coronary bifurcation lesions who were randomly selected to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention by either double or single stenting. Six studies (n=1642 patients) were eligible. There was increased risk of myocardial infarction with double stenting (risk ratio, 1.78; <I>P</I>=0.001 by fixed effects; risk ratio, 1.49 with Bayesian meta-analysis). The summary point estimate suggested also an increased risk of stent thrombosis with double stenting, but the difference was not nominally significant given the sparse data (risk ratio, 1.85; <I>P</I>=0.19). No obvious difference was seen for death (risk ratio, 0.81; <I>P</I>=0.66) and target lesion revascularization (risk ratio, 1.09; <I>P</I>=0.67).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Stenting of both the main vessel and side branch in bifurcation lesions may increase myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis risk compared with stenting of the main vessel only.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katritsis, D. G., Siontis, G. C.M., Ioannidis, J. P.A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.868091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Double Versus Single Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>415</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>409</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Follow-Up on a Large Cohort of "Full-Metal Jacket" Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Limited long-term data exist on patients who have undergone drug-eluting stenting of very long lesions (requiring &ge;60 mm of continuous stent) in native coronary arteries ("full-metal jacket").</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We examined consecutive procedures taking place between March 2002 and 2007 at 2 high-volume centers in Milan, Italy. Exclusion criteria were percutaneous coronary intervention for restenosis, percutaneous coronary intervention to a bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI). We identified 658 full-metal jacket lesions in 617 patients. Average age of the cohort was 62.0&plusmn;10.6; 32.8% were diabetic, 51.5% had a previous MI, and 33.4% had undergone a previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Mean ejection fraction was 52.1&plusmn;10.4%. The lesion was a chronic total occlusion in 33.0%. Median duration of clinical follow-up was 39 months (interquartile range, 28 to 50). Six-month follow-up was achieved in 97% of patients; 2-year follow-up was achieved in 91%. All-cause mortality rate was 7.3%; cardiac death rate was 3.6%. Non&ndash;procedure-related MI rates were 3.5%. Target lesion revascularization rates were 23.4%. There were 17 cases of Academic Research Consortium&ndash;defined definite or probable stent thrombosis (2.6%): 5 acute, 2 subacute, 6 late, and 4 very late. Ten of the 17 cases occurred while the patient was receiving dual antiplatelet therapy; 4 of the 17 after premature termination of 1 or both antiplatelets, and 3 of the 17 occurred while the patient was receiving single-antiplatelet therapy, after having completed the prescribed course of dual antiplatelet therapy.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusion&mdash;</I></b> When very long lesions (&ge;60 mm) were treated using overlapping drug-eluting stents, 23.4% required a further procedure for restenosis at 3-year follow-up. However, MI, stent thrombosis, and cardiac mortality rates were relatively low.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharp, A. S.P., Latib, A., Ielasi, A., Larosa, C., Godino, C., Saolini, M., Magni, V., Gerber, R. T., Montorfano, M., Carlino, M., Michev, I., Chieffo, A., Colombo, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chronic ischemic heart disease, Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other, Restenosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.886945</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Follow-Up on a Large Cohort of "Full-Metal Jacket" Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>422</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Significantly Improved Vascular Complications Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Women are at a higher risk for bleeding/vascular complications (VC) related to cardiovascular procedures. Although the overall incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related bleeding/VC has declined, the impact of this decline, specifically in women, is unknown.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We studied 13 653 female and 32 334 male consecutive cases, from 2002 to 2007, in the Northern New England PCI Registry. We sought to (1) compare absolute rates of bleeding/VC in women and men over time, (2) define predictors of bleeding/VC in women and men undergoing PCI, and (3) trend the impact of female gender in predicting bleeding/VC over time. Bleeding/VC was defined as any access-site vessel injury requiring surgical intervention or bleeding requiring transfusion. The overall risk of bleeding/VC was significantly higher in women versus men (4.5&plusmn;1.3% versus 1.6&plusmn;0.5%; <I>P</I>&lt;0.004). Over time, there was a significant (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001) 50% decrease in absolute bleeding/VC rates in both women and men. After adjustment for baseline differences, female gender remained a significant predictor of increased risk in 2007 (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.74 to 3.91). Independent predictors of increased risk of bleeding/VC in women included older age, shock, renal failure, presentation with non-ST-elevation myocardial infraction and larger sheath sizes, whereas the use of fluoroscopy-guided access, closure devices, history of dyslipidemia or prior PCI, and use of bivalirudin were protective.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusion&mdash;</I></b> Women undergoing PCI have had a significant decline in bleeding/VC rates during the last 6 years. Despite the improvement in procedural safety, female gender continues to be associated with a &gt;2-fold risk of bleeding/VC compared with men.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed, B., Piper, W. D., Malenka, D., VerLee, P., Robb, J., Ryan, T., Herne, M., Phillips, W., Dauerman, H. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.860494</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Significantly Improved Vascular Complications Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>429</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/430?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Choice of Contrast Medium in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/430?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> No clinical trial has yet focused on contrast-mediated nephrotoxicity in patients with chronic renal failure exclusively undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of contemporary contrast media on nephrotoxicity in this high-risk patient population.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> This prospective, randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical trial randomly selected 939 patients with chronic renal failure undergoing coronary angiography with potential PCI to receive either the iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol or the low-osmolar contrast medium iomeprol. Of those 939 patients, 615 received diagnostic angiography only and were not included in the primary study analysis, but were followed up in a registry. Three hundred twenty-four patients underwent PCI, of which one-half received iodixanol or iomeprol, respectively, and were included in the primary study analysis. The primary end point was the peak increase in <I>S</I>-creatinine during hospitalization for PCI. Maximum increase in <I>S</I>-creatinine after PCI was lower than expected and thus impaired the power of the study. It was not significantly different between the 2 contrast groups (0.19&plusmn;0.40 mg/dL for iodixanol and 0.21&plusmn;0.34 mg/dL for iomeprol; <I>P</I>=0.53). Albeit contrast media-induced nephropathy rates were lower with iodixanol (22.2% compared with 27.8% for iomeprol), this difference was not statistically different (<I>P</I>=0.25). Subgroup analysis suggested a favorable outcome regarding nephrotoxicity in patients who received higher contrast volumes (&gt;340 mL) in the iodixanol group (<I>P</I><SUB>interaction</SUB>=0.016).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Routine use of iso-osmolar contrast medium is not associated with a significant reduction of nephrotoxicity compared with low-osmolar contrast medium in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing PCI. However, a positive effect was seen in the iso-osmolar contrast group for patients receiving high amounts of contrast medium, which awaits confirmation of a specifically designed randomized clinical trial.</p>
<p><b><I>Clinical Trial Registration&mdash;</I></b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00390585</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wessely, R., Koppara, T., Bradaric, C., Vorpahl, M., Braun, S., Schulz, S., Mehilli, J., Schomig, A., Kastrati, A., for the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Coronary Revascularization by Angioplasty (CONTRAST) Trial investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other, Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.874933</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Choice of Contrast Medium in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>437</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>430</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/438?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Carotid Duplex Ultrasound Velocity Measurements Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Detecting Carotid In-Stent Restenosis [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/438?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Duplex ultrasonography criteria for assessing the severity of carotid artery (CA) in-stent restenosis are not well established.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We analyzed 39 patients (40 CAs) who underwent CA stenting with baseline and 6-month follow-up carotid duplex ultrasonography and intravascular ultrasound. Intravascular ultrasound measurements included minimum luminal diameter, percent diameter, and lumen area stenosis. Duplex ultrasonography measurements included peak systolic velocity (PSV), percentage change in PSV, end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and internal-to-common CA PSV ratio (ICA/CCA). Receiver operating characteristic curves assessed each duplex measurement to detect &ge;50% diameter, &ge;75% lumen area stenosis, and minimum luminal diameter &lt;3 mm at follow-up. At 6-month intravascular ultrasound follow-up, &ge;50% diameter and &ge;75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis occurred in 20% and 25%, respectively; minimum luminal diameter &lt;3 cm occurred in 48%. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves for PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA were 0.85, 0.96, and 0.89 for &ge;50% diameter stenosis and 0.89, 0.93, and 0.88 for &ge;75% lumen area stenosis, respectively. Optimal PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA criteria to detect &ge;50% diameter and &ge;75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis were greater compared with those for native CA. A &gt;98% increase in PSV had the highest specificity, whereas the combination of EDV &gt;41 cm/s and ICA/CCA &gt;2 had the highest sensitivity in detecting &ge;75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA PSV ratio were good discriminators for detecting significant diameter and lumen area greater compared with those for native CA. The combination of duplex velocity criteria increases diagnostic accuracy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan, B. P., Clark, D. J., Jaff, M. R., Kiernan, T. J., Schainfeld, R. M., Lessio, S., Rosenfield, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Carotid Stenosis, Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc., Restenosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.857276</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Carotid Duplex Ultrasound Velocity Measurements Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Detecting Carotid In-Stent Restenosis [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>443</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>438</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/444?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Significance of Echo Signal Attenuation on Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/444?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Atherosclerotic plaque that shows echo signal attenuation (EA) without associated bright echoes is sometimes observed by intravascular ultrasound but its clinical significance remains unclear. We investigated the impact of EA on coronary perfusion and evaluated the pathological features of plaque with EA.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We studied 687 native coronary lesions in 687 consecutive patients (336 with acute coronary syndrome and 351 with stable angina pectoris) who underwent intravascular ultrasound before percutaneous coronary intervention. By subgroup analysis, 60 lesions (30 lesions with EA) treated with directional coronary atherectomy underwent pathological examination. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade after percutaneous coronary intervention were compared between lesions with and without EA in 627 lesions except directional coronary atherectomy subgroup. EA was observed in 245 lesions (35.7%), and coronary flow after percutaneous coronary intervention was worse for lesions with EA than without (final TIMI grade of 0 to 2: 15.4% versus 2.4%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001; final myocardial blush grade of 0 to 2: 45.6% versus 21.4%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between no reflow (TIMI grade 0 to 2) and EA (odds ratio, 5.59; 95% CI, 2.64 to 11.85; <I>P</I>&lt;0.001), a baseline TIMI grade of 0 to 2 (odds ratio, 5.91; 95% CI, 2.79 to 12.5; <I>P</I>&lt;0.001), and a large reference area (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.76; <I>P</I>=0.005) after controlling for other associated factors. Pathological examination revealed a significantly higher frequency of lipid-rich plaque with microcalcification in lesions with EA.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Atherosclerotic plaque with EA showed a significant association with no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention, suggesting the existence of fragile components susceptible to distal embolization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimura, S., Kakuta, T., Yonetsu, T., Suzuki, A., Iesaka, Y., Fujiwara, H., Isobe, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.821124</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Significance of Echo Signal Attenuation on Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>454</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>444</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/455?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients With Transcatheter Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defects: A Longitudinal Study [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/455?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may develop in patients with atrial septal defects (ASD); however, little is known about associated risk factors and its evolution after transcatheter ASD closure.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We conducted a cohort study on 215 adults with attempted transcatheter ASD closure from 1999 to 2006. Patients were classified according to baseline systolic pulmonary artery pressures as having no (I, &lt;40 mm Hg), mild (II, 40 to 49 mm Hg), moderate (III, 50 to 59 mm Hg), or severe (IV, &ge;60 mm Hg) PAH. Independent predictors of moderate or severe PAH were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.10 per year; <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001), larger ASD (OR, 1.13 per millimeter; <I>P</I>=0.0052), female sex (OR, 3.9; <I>P</I>=0.0313), and at least moderate tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 3.6; <I>P</I>=0.0043). At 15 (interquartile range, 8 to 43) months post&ndash;ASD closure, patients with higher baseline pressures were more likely to experience a &ge;5-mm Hg decrease (33.7%, 73.9%, 79.2%, and 100.0% in groups I to IV, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001), with a larger magnitude of reduction (0, 8, 17, and 22 mm Hg; <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001). However, normalization of pressures (&lt;40 mm Hg) occurred less frequently in patients with more advanced PAH (90.2%, 71.7%, 66.7%, and 23.5%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001). Among patients with moderate or severe PAH, independent predictors of normalization were lower baseline pressures (OR, 0.91 per mm Hg; <I>P</I>=0.0418) and no more than mild tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 0.14; <I>P</I>=0.0420).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusion&mdash;</I></b> In adults with ASDs, severity of PAH is modulated by age, sex, defect size, and degree of tricuspid regurgitation. Patients with moderate or severe PAH may benefit from substantial reductions in pulmonary artery pressures after transcatheter ASD closure, although the PAH values remain elevated in a sizeable proportion.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yong, G., Khairy, P., De Guise, P., Dore, A., Marcotte, F., Mercier, L.-A., Noble, S., Ibrahim, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pulmonary circulation and disease, Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.826560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients With Transcatheter Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defects: A Longitudinal Study [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>462</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>455</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/463?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The SYNTAX Trial: A Perspective [Expert Opinion]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/463?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gulati, R., Rihal, C. S., Gersh, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Chronic ischemic heart disease, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, CV surgery: coronary artery disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.882670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The SYNTAX Trial: A Perspective [Expert Opinion]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>467</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>463</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Expert Opinion</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is patent foramen ovale closure indicated for migraine?: Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Migraine [Controversies in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reisman, M., Fuller, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other Treatment, CV surgery: other, Embolic stroke, Transient Ischemic Attacks]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.876128</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is patent foramen ovale closure indicated for migraine?: Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Migraine [Controversies in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>474</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Controversies in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/475?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is patent foramen ovale closure indicated for migraine?: PFO Closure Is Not Indicated for Migraine: "Don't Shoot First, Ask Questions Later" [Controversies in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/475?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carroll, J. D., Carroll, E. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other, Brain Circulation and Metabolism, Embolic stroke, Clinical genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.860031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is patent foramen ovale closure indicated for migraine?: PFO Closure Is Not Indicated for Migraine: "Don't Shoot First, Ask Questions Later" [Controversies in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>481</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>475</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Controversies in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advances in Intravascular Imaging [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maehara, A., Mintz, G. S., Weissman, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC, Other imaging, Restenosis, Other arteriosclerosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.868398</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advances in Intravascular Imaging [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>490</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Subclavian Artery Bypass for Myocardial Perfusion During Endovascular Intervention [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/5/491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pitta, S. R., Mathew, V., Barsness, G. W., Prasad, A., Gulati, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:28 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chronic ischemic heart disease, Peripheral vascular disease, Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other, Other Treatment]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.865691</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Subclavian Artery Bypass for Myocardial Perfusion During Endovascular Intervention [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>493</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Wishful Thinking of Indirect Mitral Annuloplasty: Will It Ever Become a Reality? [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruiz, C. E., Kronzon, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Valvular heart disease, Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.888586</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Wishful Thinking of Indirect Mitral Annuloplasty: Will It Ever Become a Reality? [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Off-Label Use and the Spectre of Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cook, S., Wenaweser, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Arterial thrombosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.891218</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Off-Label Use and the Spectre of Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty: Initial Human Experience With a Novel Coronary Sinus Implant Device [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> We assessed the safety and feasibility of permanent implantation of a novel coronary sinus mitral repair device (PTMA, Viacor Inc).</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Symptomatic (New York Heart Association class 2 or 3) patients with primarily functional mitral regurgitation (MR) were included. A diagnostic PTMA procedure was performed in the coronary sinus venous continuity. MR was assessed and the PTMA device adjusted to optimize efficacy. If MR reduction (&ge;1 grade) was observed, placement of a PTMA implant was attempted. Implanted patients were evaluated with echocardiographic, quality of life, and exercise capacity metrics. Nineteen patients received a diagnostic PTMA study. Diagnostic PTMA was effective in 13 patients (MR grade 3.2&plusmn;0.6 reduced to 2.0&plusmn;1.0), and PTMA implants were placed in 9 patients. Four devices were removed uneventfully (7, 84, 197, and 216 days), 3 for annuloplasty surgery due to observed PTMA device migration and/or diminished efficacy. No procedure or device-related major adverse events with permanent sequela were observed in any of the diagnostic or implant patients. Sustained reductions of mitral annulus septal-lateral dimension from 3D echo reconstruction dimensions were observed (4.0&plusmn;1.2 mm at 3 months).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Percutaneous implantation of the PTMA device is feasible and safe. Acute results demonstrate a possibly meaningful reduction of MR in responding patients. Sustained favorable geometric modification of the mitral annulus has been observed, though reduction of MR has been limited. The PTMA method warrants continued evaluation and development.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sack, S., Kahlert, P., Bilodeau, L., Pierard, L. A., Lancellotti, P., Legrand, V., Bartunek, J., Vanderheyden, M., Hoffmann, R., Schauerte, P., Shiota, T., Marks, D. S., Erbel, R., Ellis, S. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other, Congestive]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.855205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty: Initial Human Experience With a Novel Coronary Sinus Implant Device [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>284</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis in Routine Clinical Practice: Two-Year Outcomes and Predictors From the TAXUS ARRIVE Registries [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Stent thrombosis (ST) is an uncommon but serious complication of drug-eluting and bare metal stents. To assess drug-eluting stent ST in contemporary practice, we analyzed 2-year data from the 7492-patient ARRIVE registry.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Patients were enrolled at the initiation of percutaneous coronary intervention with no inclusion/exclusion criteria beyond use of the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent. Two-year follow-up was 94% with independent adjudication of major cardiac events. A second, autonomous committee adjudicated Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definite/probable ST. Cumulative 2-year ARC-defined ST was 2.6% (1.0% early ST [&lt;30 days], 0.7% late ST [31 to 365 days], and 0.8% very late ST [&gt;1 year]). Simple-use (single-vessel and single-stent) cases had lower rates than expanded use (broader patient/lesion characteristics, 2-year cumulative: 1.4% versus 3.3%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001; early ST: 0.4% versus 1.4%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001; late ST: 0.5% versus 0.8%, <I>P</I>=0.14; very late ST: 0.4% versus 1.0%, <I>P</I>=0.008). Within 7 days of ST, 23% of patients died; 28% suffered Q-wave myocardial infarction. Mortality was higher with early ST (39%) than late ST (12%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001) or very late ST (13%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001). Multivariate analysis showed anatomic factors increased early ST (lesion &gt;28 mm, lesion calcification) and late ST (vessel &lt;3.0 mm); biological factors increased very late ST (renal disease, prior brachytherapy). Although early ST (71.4%) and very late ST (23.1%) patients had dual antiplatelet therapy at the time of ST, premature thienopyridine discontinuation was a strong independent predictor of both.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> The relative risks of early and late ST differ. Knowledge of ST risk for specific subgroups may guide revascularization options until the completion of randomized trials in these broad populations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lasala, J. M., Cox, D. A., Dobies, D., Baran, K., Bachinsky, W. B., Rogers, E. W., Breall, J. A., Lewis, D. H., Song, A., Starzyk, R. M., Mascioli, S. R., Dawkins, K. D., Baim, D. S., for the ARRIVE 1 and ARRIVE 2 Participating Physicians]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Restenosis, Arterial thrombosis, Thrombosis risk factors, Clinical Studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.852178.109.852178</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis in Routine Clinical Practice: Two-Year Outcomes and Predictors From the TAXUS ARRIVE Registries [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/294?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Catheter-Based Delivery of Fluid Paclitaxel for Prevention of Restenosis in Native Coronary Artery Lesions After Stent Implantation [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/294?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Stents eluting antiproliferative drugs reduce the incidence of restenosis but delay healing of the vascular wall. We assessed the safety and efficacy of catheter-based local delivery of fluid paclitaxel in patients with coronary de novo stenoses after implantation of a bare metal stent.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing the local delivery of fluid paclitaxel after bare metal stent implantation (group I) with the implantation of a bare metal stent (group II) and the implantation of a paclitaxel-eluting stent (group III) in 204 patients. The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss. Secondary end points included binary restenosis rate &gt;50%, minimal lumen diameter, diameter stenosis, and a composite clinical end point (major adverse cardiac events and revascularization of the target lesion) 6 months after intervention. At 6 months, angiography showed an in-stent late lumen loss of 0.61&plusmn;0.44 mm in group I versus 0.99&plusmn;0.72 mm in group II (I versus II, <I>P</I>=0.0006) and 0.44&plusmn;0.48 mm in group III (noninferiority of I versus III, <I>P</I>=0.023). The 1-sided 95% CI for the true difference of the means of in-stent late lumen loss in groups I and III was &ndash; to 0.3174188. The cumulative overall rate of major cardiac events was 13.4% in group I, 26.8% in group II, and 14.9% in group III. Target lesion revascularization rate was 13.4% (group I), 22.1% (group II), and 13.4% (group III).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Additional antiproliferative treatment of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with catheter-based delivery of fluid paclitaxel after bare metal stenting was safe and significantly reduced neointimal proliferation, restenosis, and clinical events compared with bare metal stent implantation alone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herdeg, C., Gohring-Frischholz, K., Haase, K. K., Geisler, T., Zurn, C., Hartmann, U., Wohrle, J., Nusser, T., Dippon, J., May, A. E., Gawaz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Other Treatment, Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Restenosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.827865.108.827865</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Catheter-Based Delivery of Fluid Paclitaxel for Prevention of Restenosis in Native Coronary Artery Lesions After Stent Implantation [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>301</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>294</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/302?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Usefulness of the SYNTAX Score for Predicting Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/302?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> The SYNTAX score (SXscore) has been proposed recently as a valuable tool to characterize the coronary vasculature prospectively with respect to the number of lesions and their functional impact, location, and complexity. However, the prognostic value of SXscores in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main artery has not been validated.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We applied the SXscore in 255 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease and explored its performance with respect to their clinical outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relation between the SXscore and the incidence of cardiac mortality, the primary end point of the study, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). At 1 year, the SXscore significantly predicted the risk of cardiac death (hazard ratio, 1.12/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18; <I>P</I>&lt;0.001) and MACE (hazard ratio, 1.59/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.48; <I>P</I>=0.043). After adjustment for potential confounders, a higher SXscore remained significantly associated with cardiac mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.26; <I>P</I>=0.003) and MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10; <I>P</I>=0.005). C-indexes for SXscores in terms of cardiac death and MACE were 0.83 and 0.64, respectively. Using classification tree analysis, discrimination levels of 34 and 37 were identified as the optimal cutoff to distinguish between patients at low and high risk of cardiac death and MACE, respectively.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> The SXscore is a useful tool to predict cardiac mortality and MACE in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization of the left main coronary artery.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capodanno, D., Di Salvo, M. E., Cincotta, G., Miano, M., Tamburino, C., Tamburino, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Usefulness of the SYNTAX Score for Predicting Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>308</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>302</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/309?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Adverse Long-Term Impact of Renal Impairment in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/309?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> An observational study determining the long-term impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at a tertiary cardiac referral center. CKD is associated with poor in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention, but its effect beyond 1 year, particularly in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era, has not been reported.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Baseline creatinine was available for 11 953 patients entered into a prospective registry (April 2000 to September 2007). Patients were stratified: those with or without at least moderate CKD (creatinine clearance, &lt;60 mL/min). Follow-up data were obtained through linkage to a provincial registry. Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis was performed. Cox multiple-regression analysis identified independent predictors of late mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and examined the association between DES use and late outcomes in the presence or absence of CKD. CKD was present in 3070 patients (25.7%). In-hospital mortality and MACE were significantly increased in CKD (3.34% versus 0.44%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001 and 5.73% versus 2.2%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001). Survival and MACE-free survival at 7 years were reduced (64.5&plusmn;1.4% versus 89.4&plusmn;0.5%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001; 44.0&plusmn;1.4% versus 63.4&plusmn;0.8%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001). CKD was an independent predictor of late mortality and MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.18, CI: 1.90 to 2.49, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; HR: 1.37, CI: 1.25 to 1.49, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001). DES use was associated with a significant reduction in both (HR: 0.71, CI: 0.60 to 0.83, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; HR: 0.70, CI: 0.63 to 0.78, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001). In patients with CKD, DES use was associated with reduced revascularization (HR: 0.68, CI: 0.53 to 0.88, <I>P</I>=0.004) and reduced MACE (HR: 0.81, CI: 0.69 to 0.95, <I>P</I>=0.011) but not reduced mortality (HR: 0.85, CI: 0.69 to 1.05, <I>P</I>=0.1).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusion&mdash;</I></b> In a large registry of "all comers" for percutaneous coronary intervention, CKD was an independent predictor of adverse late outcomes. DES use may be associated with improved long-term outcomes in this high-risk cohort, but further prospective studies are required.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Appleby, C. E., Ivanov, J., Lavi, S., Mackie, K., Horlick, E. M., Ing, D., Overgaard, C. B., Seidelin, P. H., von Harsdorf, R., Dzavik, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chronic ischemic heart disease, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.828954</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Adverse Long-Term Impact of Renal Impairment in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>316</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/317?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vascular Disease Burden and In-Hospital Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York State [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/317?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> The presence of atherosclerosis in extracardiac vascular beds is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes among stable patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is little data regarding the impact of the presence and extent of vascular disease on outcomes in patients with CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We analyzed 69 045 consecutive patients from the New York State Coronary Angioplasty Reporting System database who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between 1998 and 1999. Vascular disease burden was assessed by history of aortoiliac, femoral-popliteal, and carotid disease. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: CAD alone, CAD and 1 additional site, and CAD and 2 or 3 additional sites. A logistic regression model was constructed to determine the relation between vascular disease burden and in-hospital mortality. Any history of vascular disease was present in 5915 (8.6%) of the population, of whom 4840 (82%) had CAD and 1 other disease location and 1075 (18%) had CAD and 2 or 3 other disease locations. There was a significant relationship between the number of disease locations and hospital mortality, ranging from 0.7% in patients with CAD alone to 2.0% and 2.6% for patients with 1 or &ge;2 disease locations, respectively (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001). In unadjusted analysis, in-hospital mortality was 3-fold higher (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.31 to 3.60; <I>P</I>&lt;0.001) and 4-fold higher (odds ratio, 3.78; 95% CI, 2.57 to 5.56; <I>P</I>&lt;0.001) for inpatients with CAD and additional vascular disease at 1 site and &ge;2 sites, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, each additional vascular bed affected was associated with a 50% increase in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.78; <I>P</I>&lt;0.001).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Among patients with CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, vascular disease burden is associated with higher rates of adverse events and is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berger, J. S., Petersen, J. L., Brown, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chronic ischemic heart disease, Peripheral vascular disease, Health policy and outcome research, Other arteriosclerosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847459.108.847459</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vascular Disease Burden and In-Hospital Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York State [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>322</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Administration During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Coronary microvascular dysfunction is frequently seen in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Previous studies have suggested that the administration of intravenous adenosine resulted in an improvement of myocardial perfusion and a reduction in infarct size. Intracoronary adenosine (bolus of 30 to 60 &micro;g) is a guideline-recommended therapy to improve myocardial reperfusion. The effect of intracoronary adenosine during primary percutaneous coronary intervention has not been investigated in a large randomized trial.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to 2 bolus injections of intracoronary adenosine (2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>120 &micro;g in 20 mL NaCl) or placebo (2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>20 mL NaCl). The first bolus injection was given after thrombus aspiration and the second after stenting of the infarct-related artery. The primary end point was the incidence of residual ST-segment deviation &lt;0.2 mV, 30 to 60 minutes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Secondary end points were ST-segment elevation resolution, myocardial blush grade, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow on the angiogram after percutaneous coronary intervention, enzymatic infarct size, and clinical outcome at 30 days. A total of 448 patients were randomized to intracoronary adenosine (N=226) or placebo (N=222). The incidence of residual ST-segment deviation &lt;0.2 mV did not differ between patients randomized to adenosine or placebo (46.2% versus 52.2%, <I>P</I>=NS). In addition, there were no significant differences in secondary outcome measures.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> In this randomized placebo controlled trial enrolling 448 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, administration of intracoronary adenosine after thrombus aspiration and after stenting of the infarct-related artery did not result in improved myocardial perfusion.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fokkema, M. L., Vlaar, P. J., Vogelzang, M., Gu, Y. L., Kampinga, M. A., de Smet, B. J., Jessurun, G. A., Anthonio, R. L., van den Heuvel, A. F., Tan, E.-S., Zijlstra, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute myocardial infarction, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Cardiovascular Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.858977.109.858977</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Administration During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>329</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/330?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Primary Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty With and Without Eptifibatide in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Safety and Efficacy Study of Integrilin-Facilitated Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ASSIST) [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/330?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, if performed promptly, is the preferred strategy to restore flow to the infarct-related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We sought to determine whether eptifibatide, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, given before catheterization would improve clinical outcomes in patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We randomly assigned a total of 400 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention to treatment initiated before cardiac catheterization, with either heparin plus eptifibatide (201 patients) or heparin alone (199 patients), in addition to oral aspirin (160 mg) and high-dose clopidogrel (600 mg). The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, recurrent myocardial infarction, or recurrent severe ischemia during the first 30 days after randomization. At 30 days, the primary end point was reached by 13 patients (6.47%) assigned to heparin plus eptifibatide and by 11 patients (5.53%) assigned to heparin alone (relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.52 to 2.70; <I>P</I>=0.69). The rates of major or minor bleeding were higher in patients assigned to heparin plus eptifibatide than that in patients assigned to heparin alone (22.4% versus 14.6%; relative risk, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.83; <I>P</I>=0.04).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> In patients pretreated with high-dose clopidogrel who were referred for primary PCI, treatment with heparin plus eptifibatide, when compared with heparin alone, did not improve clinical outcomes and was associated with more bleeding complications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le May, M. R., Wells, G. A., Glover, C. A., So, D. Y., Froeschl, M., Marquis, J.-F., O'Brien, E. R., Turek, M., Thomas, A., Kass, M., Jadhav, S., Labinaz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute myocardial infarction, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Platelet function inhibitors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847582.108.847582</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Primary Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty With and Without Eptifibatide in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Safety and Efficacy Study of Integrilin-Facilitated Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ASSIST) [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>338</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>330</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Two-Year Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions: The SPIRIT II Trial [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> This article reports the 2-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in the randomized SPIRIT II trial.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> This was a prospective, single-blind clinical trial in which a total of 300 patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomized to either EES or PES in a 3:1 fashion. Clinical follow-up was planned at 2 years in all patients. A subset of 152 patients underwent serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analyses at 6 months and 2 years. After 2 years, target lesion failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) rates were 6.6% and 11% in EES and PES, respectively (<I>P</I>=0.31). At 6 months, a significant reduction in angiographic in-stent late loss and percentage volume obstruction measured by intravascular ultrasound was observed in the EES group. However, at 2-year follow-up, a late increased intimal hyperplasia growth after implantation of an EES was observed. There were no significant differences between EES and PES for in-stent late loss (EES, 0.33&plusmn;0.37 mm versus PES, 0.34&plusmn;0.34 mm; <I>P</I>=0.84) and percentage volume obstruction (EES, 5.18&plusmn;6.22% versus PES, 5.80&plusmn;6.31%; <I>P</I>=0.65) at 2 years. The incidence of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups (EES, 0.9%; PES, 1.4%).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Although the previously reported angiographic and clinical superiority of the EES has vanished over time, this report confirms and extends the previously demonstrated noninferiority in terms of in-stent late loss of the EES when compared with the PES up to 2-year follow-up. There were no significant differences between EES and PES in clinical, angiographic and intravascular ultrasound outcomes at 2 years.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claessen, B. E., Beijk, M. A., Legrand, V., Ruzyllo, W., Manari, A., Varenne, O., Suttorp, M. J., Tijssen, J. G.P., Miquel-Hebert, K., Veldhof, S., Henriques, J. P.S., Serruys, P. W., Piek, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.831800.108.831800</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Two-Year Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions: The SPIRIT II Trial [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>347</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/348?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frequency of Allergic or Hematologic Adverse Reactions to Ticlopidine Among Patients With Allergic or Hematologic Adverse Reactions to Clopidogrel [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/348?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Clopidogrel and ticlopidine are structurally very similar. In patients with an allergic or hematologic adverse reaction to either one of these drugs, the likelihood that an allergic or hematologic adverse effect will develop to the other is unknown. It is also unknown whether a reaction to the second thienopyridine is likely to be life threatening.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Medical records from 2 academic institutions were reviewed to identify patients who had an allergic or hematologic adverse reaction to either of the 2 currently commercially available thienopyridines and who were subsequently prescribed the other thienopyridine. Patient demographics, details of the adverse reactions, and subsequent clinical course were reviewed. A total of 76 patients were identified with an allergic or hematologic adverse reaction to clopidogrel or ticlopidine who had also received the other thienopyridine. Fourteen (27%; 95% CI, 16 to 41) patients who had an allergic or hematologic adverse reactions to clopidogrel had a similar reaction to ticlopidine; none developed a life-threatening reaction. The most common reaction was a rash (93%).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> In patients with an allergic or hematologic adverse reaction to one thienopyridine, there seems to be an increased frequency of such reactions to the other thienopyridine. However, no patient had a life-threatening reaction after exposure to the alternative thienopyridine.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lokhandwala, J. O., Best, P. J.M., Butterfield, J. H., Skelding, K. A., Scott, T., Blankenship, J. C., Buckley, J. W., Berger, P. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other anticoagulants]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.832964.108.832964</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frequency of Allergic or Hematologic Adverse Reactions to Ticlopidine Among Patients With Allergic or Hematologic Adverse Reactions to Clopidogrel [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>351</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>348</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/352?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug-Eluting Balloon: The Comeback Kid? [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/352?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waksman, R., Pakala, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Angioplasty and Stenting, Restenosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.873703</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug-Eluting Balloon: The Comeback Kid? [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>352</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intimal Dissection Causing Late Thrombosis of a Covered Stent: Optical Coherence Tomography Appearances [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adlam, D., Ayers, R., Channon, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Acute myocardial infarction, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Other diagnostic testing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.870956</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intimal Dissection Causing Late Thrombosis of a Covered Stent: Optical Coherence Tomography Appearances [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>360</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/361?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hemodynamic Effect of Myocardial Bridging [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/4/361?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kersemans, M., Van Heuverswyn, F., De Pauw, M., Gheeraert, P., Taeymans, Y., Drieghe, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:31:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC, Other diagnostic testing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.855395</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hemodynamic Effect of Myocardial Bridging [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>362</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>361</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Cart and The Horse: The Advancing Technology of Carotid Artery Stenting [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldstein, L. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Carotid Stenosis, Primary prevention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.874578</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Cart and The Horse: The Advancing Technology of Carotid Artery Stenting [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>155</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/156?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unprotected Left Main Intervention: The Light at the End of the Tunnel? [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/156?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stone, G. W., Mintz, G. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.875971</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unprotected Left Main Intervention: The Light at the End of the Tunnel? [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/159?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thirty-Day Outcomes for Carotid Artery Stenting in 6320 Patients From 2 Prospective, Multicenter, High-Surgical-Risk Registries [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/159?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> The American Heart Association has established guidelines for acceptable 30-day death and stroke rates for patients with severe carotid disease undergoing standard-risk carotid endarterectomy: &lt;3% for asymptomatic lesions and &lt;6% for symptomatic lesions. To date, carotid artery stenting has not demonstrated these outcomes in multicenter, prospective assessments of high-surgical-risk patients.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Data from 2 prospective, multicenter (280 US sites, 672 operators), postmarket surveillance studies in high-surgical-risk patients were analyzed: 2145 patients from the Emboshield and Xact Post Approval Carotid Stent Trial (EX) and 4175 patients from the Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (C2). Both studies had pre- and postprocedure neurological evaluation and independent adjudication of neurological events. The overall 30-day death and stroke rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.0%) for EX and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.0%) for C2. In the population comparable with American Heart Association guidelines (&lt;80 years), the combined 30-day death and stroke rate was 5.3% (95% CI, 3.6% to 7.4%) for symptomatic patients and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.4% to 3.4%) for asymptomatic patients, independent of unfavorable risk factors (anatomic or physiologic); in patients &ge;80 years, this rate was 10.5% (95% CI, 6.3% to 16.0%) and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.7%), respectively. In subjects with anatomic features unfavorable for surgery, the 30-day death and stroke rates were 1.7% (95% CI, 0.0% to 8.9%) and 2.7% (95% CI, 1.3% to 4.9%) for symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts, respectively, independent of age.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Outcomes for carotid artery stenting in nonoctogenarian high-surgical-risk patients have improved since the pivotal Food and Drug Administration approval trials, and have achieved American Heart Association standards in both symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gray, W. A., Chaturvedi, S., Verta, P., on behalf of the Investigators and the Executive Committees]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Carotid Stenosis, Carotid endarterectomy, Angioplasty and Stenting]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thirty-Day Outcomes for Carotid Artery Stenting in 6320 Patients From 2 Prospective, Multicenter, High-Surgical-Risk Registries [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>166</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/167?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/167?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance has been useful in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis, its impact on long-term mortality is still unclear.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> In the MAIN-COMPARE registry, patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in a hemodynamically stable condition underwent elective stenting under the guidance of IVUS (756 patients) or conventional angiography (219 patients). Patients with acute myocardial infarction were excluded. The 3-year outcomes between the 2 groups were primarily compared using propensity-score matching in the entire and separate populations according to stent type. In 201 matched pairs of the overall population, there was a tendency of lower risk of 3-year morality with IVUS guidance compared with angiography guidance (6.0% versus 13.6%, log-rank <I>P</I>=0.063; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.03; Cox-model <I>P</I>=0.061). In particular, in 145 matched pairs of patients receiving drug-eluting stent, the 3-year incidence of mortality was lower with IVUS guidance as compared with angiography guidance (4.7% versus 16.0%, log-rank <I>P</I>=0.048; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.02; Cox model <I>P</I>=0.055). In contrast, the use of IVUS guidance did not reduce the risk of mortality in 47 matched pairs of patients receiving bare-metal stent (8.6% versus 10.8%, log-rank <I>P</I>=0.35; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.18 to 1.91; Cox model <I>P</I>=0.38). The risk of myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization was not associated with the use of IVUS guidance.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Elective stenting with IVUS guidance, especially in the placement of drug-eluting stent, may reduce the long-term mortality rate for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis when compared with conventional angiography guidance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, S.-J., Kim, Y.-H., Park, D.-W., Lee, S.-W., Kim, W.-J., Suh, J., Yun, S.-C., Lee, C. W., Hong, M.-K., Lee, J.-H., Park, S.-W., for the MAIN-COMPARE Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.799494</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/178?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Outcomes in Elderly Patients [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/178?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Although drug-eluting stents have become a mainstay of percutaneous coronary intervention, information about drug-eluting stents outcomes in elderly patients is limited. Data from the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) trials and registries were pooled to assess PES benefits relative to advancing patient age, including comparison with bare-metal stents.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Data from 5 randomized trials (2271 patients with PES, 1397 patients with bare-metal stents) and from 2 postmarket registries (7492 patients with PES) were pooled separately. Each dataset was stratified into age groups: &lt;60, 60 to 70, and &gt;70 years. At baseline, patients aged &gt;70 years in both datasets had significantly more adverse characteristics than younger patients. Through 5 years, trial data showed that patients aged &gt;70 years had higher death rates, but comparable rates of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization with younger patients. Compared with patients with bare-metal stents, patients with PES aged &gt;70 years had comparable rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis but a significantly lower target lesion revascularization rate (22.2 versus 10.2, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001). These findings were echoed in the registry data through 2 years that showed that PES patients aged &gt;70 years had significantly higher death rates, but lower myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization rates, compared with younger patients. Although the mortality rates of patients aged &gt;70 years were higher than those of younger patients, they were comparable with those of age- and gender-matched norms in the general population.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> This analysis of almost 10 000 patients demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention with PES is a safe and an effective treatment option that should not be withheld based on age.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forman, D. E., Cox, D. A., Ellis, S. G., Lasala, J. M., Ormiston, J. A., Stone, G. W., Turco, M. A., Wei, J. Y., Joshi, A. A., Dawkins, K. D., Baim, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chronic ischemic heart disease, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.855221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Outcomes in Elderly Patients [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/188?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized Comparison of the Nobori Biolimus A9-Eluting Coronary Stent With the Taxus Liberte Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent in Patients With Stenosis in Native Coronary Arteries: The NOBORI 1 Trial--Phase 2 [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/188?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> The newly developed Nobori coronary stent coated with a bioresorbable polymer, polylactic acid, and the antiproliferative agent Biolimus A9 has the potential to reduce restenosis by suppressing neointima formation.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We conducted a randomized (2:1), controlled trial comparing the Biolimus A9-eluting stent Nobori and the paclitaxel-eluting stent Taxus Libert&eacute;, in 243 patients (153 Nobori and 90 Taxus) at 29 centers in Europe, Asia, and Australia. Patients with previously untreated lesions in up to 2 native coronary arteries were considered for enrollment. The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 9 months, whereas secondary end points included other quantitative coronary angiography parameters, such as in-segment late loss and the rate of restenosis as well as key intravascular ultrasound parameters. Clinical secondary end points were stent thrombosis and composite of major adverse cardiac events comprising death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. At 9 months, the in-stent late loss was significantly lower in the Nobori group compared with the Taxus group (0.11&plusmn;0.30 mm versus 0.32&plusmn;0.50 mm) reaching both the primary hypothesis of noninferiority of Nobori stent versus Taxus Libert&eacute; stent (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001) and the secondary hypothesis of superiority (<I>P</I>=0.001). This finding was confirmed by a significant reduction in binary restenosis from 6.2% in Taxus to 0.7% in Nobori (<I>P</I>=0.02) and neointimal volume obstruction, detected by intravascular ultrasound, from 5.5&plusmn;7.2% in Taxus to 1.8&plusmn;5.2% in Nobori (<I>P</I>=0.01). The major adverse cardiac events rate was 4.6% in the Nobori and 5.6% in the Taxus cohort of patients. The stent thrombosis rate was 0% in the Nobori arm and 4.4% in the Taxus arm.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> The NOBORI 1 clinical trial confirmed its primary hypothesis&mdash;noninferiority of the Nobori Biolimus A9-eluting stent versus the Taxus Libert&eacute; stent in reducing neointimal proliferation. Both stents showed a low major adverse cardiac events rate in the studied population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chevalier, B., Silber, S., Park, S.-J., Garcia, E., Schuler, G., Suryapranata, H., Koolen, J., Hauptmann, K. E., Wijns, W., Morice, M.-C., Carrie, D., van Es, G.-A., Nagai, H., Detiege, D., Paunovic, D., Serruys, P. W., for the NOBORI 1 Clinical Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823443</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized Comparison of the Nobori Biolimus A9-Eluting Coronary Stent With the Taxus Liberte Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent in Patients With Stenosis in Native Coronary Arteries: The NOBORI 1 Trial--Phase 2 [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of NAD(P)H Oxidase-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species on Coronary Arterial Remodeling: A Comparative Intravascular Ultrasound and Histochemical Analysis of Atherosclerotic Lesions [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Coronary arterial remodeling, which is a response to the growth of atherosclerotic plaques, is associated with plaque vulnerability. Oxidative stress induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) via NAD(P)H oxidase in the vasculature also plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis-based cardiovascular disease. In this study, the relationship between coronary arterial remodeling and ROS generation was examined by comparing preinterventional intravascular ultrasound findings of atherosclerotic lesions to the histochemical findings of corresponding specimens obtained by directional coronary atherectomy.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Predirectional coronary atherectomy intravascular ultrasound images of 49 patients were analyzed. The remodeling index was calculated by dividing the target-lesion external elastic membrane cross-sectional area by the reference-segment external elastic membrane cross-sectional area. Expansive remodeling was defined as a remodeling index of &gt;1.0. ROS generation and NAD(P)H oxidase p22<sup>phox</sup> expression in directional coronary atherectomy specimens were evaluated using the dihydroethidium staining method and immunohistochemistry as the ratio of the positive area to the total surface area in each specimen, respectively. ROS generation and p22<sup>phox</sup> expression were significantly greater in lesions with expansive remodeling than in lesions without remodeling (0.18&plusmn;0.12 versus 0.03&plusmn;0.02, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001, 0.10&plusmn;0.08 versus 0.04&plusmn;0.05, <I>P</I>=0.0039, respectively). Both ROS generation and p22<sup>phox</sup> expression significantly correlated with the intravascular ultrasound-derived remodeling index (<I>r</I>=0.77, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001, <I>r</I>=0.53, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001, respectively).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Simultaneous examination with intravascular ultrasound and immunohistochemistry analyses suggests that NAD(P)H oxidase-derived ROS is related to the coronary arterial remodeling process associated with plaque vulnerability.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terashima, M., Ohashi, Y., Azumi, H., Otsui, K., Kaneda, H., Awano, K., Kobayashi, S., Honjo, T., Suzuki, T., Maeda, K., Yokoyama, M., Inoue, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors, Remodeling, Pathophysiology, Imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.799502</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of NAD(P)H Oxidase-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species on Coronary Arterial Remodeling: A Comparative Intravascular Ultrasound and Histochemical Analysis of Atherosclerotic Lesions [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extended Follow-Up by Serial Angioscopic Observation for Bare-Metal Stents in Native Coronary Arteries: From Healing Response to Atherosclerotic Transformation of Neointima [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Although coronary angiograms after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation show late luminal narrowing beyond 4 years, the detailed changes inside the BMS have not yet been fully elucidated.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Serial angiographic and angioscopic examinations were performed immediately (baseline), 6 to 12 months (first follow-up), and &ge;4 years (second follow-up) after stenting without target lesion revascularization in 26 segments of 26 patients who received BMS deployment for their native coronary arteries. Angioscopic observation showed atherosclerotic yellow plaque crushed out by stent struts in 22 patients (85%) and mural thrombus in 21 patients (81%) at baseline. At first follow-up, white neointimal hyperplasia was almost completely buried inside the struts, and both yellow plaque and thrombus had decreased in comparison with baseline (12% and 4%, respectively; <I>P</I>&lt;0.001). The frequencies of yellow plaque and thrombus increased from the first to second follow-ups (58% and 31%, respectively; <I>P</I>&lt;0.05). All of the yellow plaques in the second follow-up were located not exterior to the struts but protruding from the vessel wall into the lumen. Late luminal narrowing, defined as an increasing of percent diameter stenosis between the first and second follow-ups, was greater in segments with yellow plaque than in those without yellow plaque (18.4&plusmn;17.3% versus 3.6&plusmn;4.2%, respectively; <I>P</I>=0.011).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> This angiographic and angioscopic study suggests that white neointima of the BMS may often change into yellow plaque over an extended period of time, and atherosclerotic progression inside the BMS may contribute to late luminal narrowing.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yokoyama, S., Takano, M., Yamamoto, M., Inami, S., Sakai, S., Okamatsu, K., Okuni, S., Seimiya, K., Murakami, D., Ohba, T., Uemura, R., Seino, Y., Hata, N., Mizuno, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.854679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extended Follow-Up by Serial Angioscopic Observation for Bare-Metal Stents in Native Coronary Arteries: From Healing Response to Atherosclerotic Transformation of Neointima [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Noncardiac Surgery and Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> The decision on whether to implant a drug-eluting or bare-metal stent during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) depends in part on the perceived likelihood of the patient developing late stent thrombosis. Noncardiac surgery and bleeding are associated with discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy and with increased stent thrombosis. We assessed the incidence of and predictors for subsequent noncardiac surgery and bleeding episodes in patients who had undergone PCI.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Hospital discharge coding data were used to identify all adult patients undergoing public hospital PCI in New Zealand from 1996 to 2001. Hospital admissions during the ensuing 5 years were analyzed for noncardiac surgery and bleeding episodes. Eleven thousand one hundred fifty-one patients (age, 62&plusmn;11 years; 30% women) underwent PCI, mainly for an acute coronary syndrome (73%). During the 5-year follow-up, 26% of the population underwent at least 1 noncardiac surgical procedure (23% orthopedic, 20% abdominal, 12% urologic, 10% vascular, 35% others) and 8.6% had at least 1 bleeding episode either requiring or occurring during hospitalization. Of those, half were gastrointestinal, and one quarter of bleeding events required blood transfusion. The main clinical predictors of noncardiac surgery were advanced age, previous noncardiac surgery, osteoarthritis, and peripheral vascular disease. A previous bleeding admission and age were the strongest predictors of subsequent bleeding.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Noncardiac surgery is required frequently after PCI, whereas bleeding is less common. Before implanting a drug-eluting or bare-metal stent, individual patient risk stratification by the interventional cardiologist should include assessment of whether there is an increased likelihood of needing noncardiac surgery or developing bleeding.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[To, A. C.Y., Armstrong, G., Zeng, I., Webster, M. W.I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Chronic ischemic heart disease, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Platelet function inhibitors, Thrombosis risk factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.830158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Noncardiac Surgery and Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/222?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Development of a Clinical Risk Algorithm From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/222?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, length of hospitalization, and cost. We identified baseline clinical characteristics associated with bleeding complications after PCI and developed a simplified, clinically useful algorithm to predict patient risk.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Data were analyzed from 302 152 PCI procedures performed at 440 US centers participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. As defined by the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, bleeding required transfusion, prolonged hospital stay, and/or a drop in hemoglobin &gt;3.0 g/dL from any location, including percutaneous entry site, retroperitoneal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and other/unknown location. Bleeding complications occurred in 2.4% of patients. From the best-fitting model consisting of 15 clinical elements associated with post-PCI bleeding in a random 80% training cohort, we developed a parsimonious risk algorithm. Predictors of bleeding included age, gender, previous heart failure, glomerular filtration rate, peripheral vascular disease, no previous PCI, New York Heart Association/Canadian Cardiovascular Society Functional Classification class IV heart failure, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non&ndash;ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock. The parsimonious model was validated in the remaining 20% of the population (c-statistic, 0.72) and in clinically relevant subgroups of patients. This simplified model was used to derive a clinical risk algorithm, with larger numbers corresponding with greater risk. In 3 categories, bleeding rates were greater in patients with higher estimates (&le;7, 0.7%; 8 to 17, 1.8%; &ge;18, 5.1%).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> This report identifies baseline clinical factors associated with bleeding and proposes a clinically useful algorithm to estimate bleeding risk. This model is potentially actionable in altering therapeutic decision making and improving outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehta, S. K., Frutkin, A. D., Lindsey, J. B., House, J. A., Spertus, J. A., Rao, S. V., Ou, F.-S., Roe, M. T., Peterson, E. D., Marso, S. P., on Behalf of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.846741</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Development of a Clinical Risk Algorithm From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/230?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Comparison of Abciximab and Small-Molecule Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Controlled Trials [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/230?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Current guidelines recommend abciximab as the preferred agent for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, yet small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are more commonly used in clinical practice. The objective of our meta-analysis was to evaluate for differences in clinical outcome between small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and abciximab in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Five randomized trials (n=2138 patients) comparing tirofiban or eptifibatide with abciximab as an adjunctive therapy to primary percutaneous coronary intervention were included in this meta-analysis. Summary odds ratios (ORs) for 30-day death, reinfarction, and major bleeding were calculated using random- and fixed-effect models. There were no differences in 30-day mortality (1.9% for small molecule versus 2.3% for abciximab; OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.55; <I>P</I>=0.58), reinfarction (1.3% versus 1.2%; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.91; <I>P</I>=0.69), or major bleeding (1.7% versus 1.3%; OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.58 to 2.49; <I>P</I>=0.61) between the 2 adjunctive strategies. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death (3.9% versus 5%; OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.46; <I>P</I>=0.43) or reinfarction on follow-up at 8 months between small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and abciximab.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusion&mdash;</I></b> In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, no difference in outcome could be identified in patients treated with small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or abciximab.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gurm, H. S., Tamhane, U., Meier, P., Grossman, P. M., Chetcuti, S., Bates, E. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute myocardial infarction, Other anticoagulants, Platelet function inhibitors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847996</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Comparison of Abciximab and Small-Molecule Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Controlled Trials [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lack of Correlation Between Noninvasive Stress Tests and Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Despite a nonobstructive coronary angiogram, many patients may still have an abnormal coronary vasomotor response to provocation and to myocardial demand during stress. The ability of noninvasive stress tests to predict coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease is unknown.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> All patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease who had invasive coronary vasomotor assessment and a noninvasive stress test (exercise ECG, stress echocardiography, or stress nuclear imaging) within 6 months of the cardiac catheterization with provocation at our institution were identified (n=376). Coronary vasomotor dysfunction was defined as a percentage increase in coronary blood flow of &le;50% to intracoronary acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent dysfunction) and/or a coronary flow reserve ratio of &le;2.5 to intracoronary adenosine (endothelium-independent dysfunction). We determined the sensitivity and specificity of various noninvasive stress tests to predict coronary vasomotor dysfunction in these patients. On invasive testing, 233 patients (63%) had coronary vasomotor dysfunction, of which 187 patients (51%) had endothelium-dependent dysfunction, 109 patients (29%) had endothelium-independent dysfunction, and 63 patients (17%) had both. On noninvasive stress testing, 157 (42%) had a positive imaging study and 56 (15%) a positive ECG stress test. The noninvasive stress tests had limited diagnostic accuracy for predicting coronary vasomotor dysfunction (41% sensitivity [95% CI, 34 to 47] and 57% specificity [95% CI, 49 to 66]), endothelium-dependent dysfunction (41% sensitivity [95% CI, 34 to 49] and 58% specificity [95% CI, 50 to 65]), or endothelium-independent dysfunction (46% sensitivity [95% CI, 37 to 56] and 61% specificity [95% CI, 54 to 67]). The exercise ECG test was more specific but less sensitive than the imaging tests.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusion&mdash;</I></b> This study suggests that a negative noninvasive stress test does not rule out coronary vasomotor dysfunction in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. This underscores the need for invasive assessment or novel more sensitive noninvasive imaging for these patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassar, A., Chareonthaitawee, P., Rihal, C. S., Prasad, A., Lennon, R. J., Lerman, L. O., Lerman, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC, Echocardiography, Nuclear cardiology and PET, Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques, Electrocardiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.841056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lack of Correlation Between Noninvasive Stress Tests and Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>244</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-Term Outcome of Therapeutic Neovascularization Using Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for Limb Ischemia [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Injection of bone marrow mononuclear cells has been reported to promote neovascularization of ischemic tissues effectively. We found that peripheral blood mononuclear cells were as efficient as bone marrow mononuclear cells for the treatment of limb ischemia in animals and showed that this treatment was feasible and safe in no-option patients with limb ischemia. However, the long-term outcome of such therapy has not been investigated.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We retrospectively analyzed the data for 42 patients who were treated between July 2002 and December 2005 by using the log-rank test, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model. Improvement of ischemic symptoms was observed in 60% to 70% of the patients. The annual rate of major amputation was decreased markedly by treatment. Improvement of ischemic symptoms was less marked in arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) patients on dialysis compared with nonhemodialysis ASO or thromboangiitis obliterans patients. Indeed, the survival rate of these patients was lower than that of nonhemodialysis ASO or thromboangiitis obliterans patients. Major adverse events such as death, major amputation, and cardiovascular events occurred mostly in ASO patients, and most of them were on dialysis. There was no significant difference in the cardiovascular event-free rate between responders and nonresponders. The survival rate of younger responders was better than that of nonresponders.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Although this study was not placebo-controlled and these initial results were from a retrospective analysis, injection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells might be safe and potentially effective for the treatment of limb ischemia, but caution is needed when managing ASO patients on dialysis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moriya, J., Minamino, T., Tateno, K., Shimizu, N., Kuwabara, Y., Sato, Y., Saito, Y., Komuro, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Peripheral vascular disease, Other Treatment]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.799361</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-Term Outcome of Therapeutic Neovascularization Using Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for Limb Ischemia [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ormiston, J. A., Serruys, P. W.S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC, CT and MRI, Remodeling, Restenosis, Restenosis, Arterial thrombosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.859173</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Resolution of Iatrogenic Aortic Dissection Illustrated by Computed Tomography [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garg, P., Buckley, O., Rybicki, F. J., Resnic, F. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, CT and MRI]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.850453</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Resolution of Iatrogenic Aortic Dissection Illustrated by Computed Tomography [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>263</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/264?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Intracoronary Whirling Current Phenomenon" and Thrombus Formation After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Visualized by Optical Coherence Tomography [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/264?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Itoh, T., Fusazaki, T., Kimura, T., Ogino, Y., Matsui, H., Sugawara, S., Goto, I., Nakamura, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chronic ischemic heart disease, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC, Arterial thrombosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.813881</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Intracoronary Whirling Current Phenomenon" and Thrombus Formation After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Visualized by Optical Coherence Tomography [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>267</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Severe Multivessel Coronary Vasospasm and Left Ventricular Ballooning Syndrome [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/3/268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haghi, D., Suselbeck, T., Wolpert, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:31:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.792887</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Severe Multivessel Coronary Vasospasm and Left Ventricular Ballooning Syndrome [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/e1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Letter by Brugaletta et al Regarding Article, "Interference of Drug-Eluting Stents and Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion: Evidence for Device-Specific Responses" [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/e1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brugaletta, S., Martin Yuste, V., Sabate, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.852996</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Letter by Brugaletta et al Regarding Article, "Interference of Drug-Eluting Stents and Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion: Evidence for Device-Specific Responses" [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e1</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/e2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Interference of Drug-Eluting Stents and Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion: Evidence for Device-Specific Responses" [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/e2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilos, M., Sarma, J., Wijns, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.859421</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Interference of Drug-Eluting Stents and Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion: Evidence for Device-Specific Responses" [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Not Just Big Kids: Closing Atrial Septal Defects in Adults Older Than 60 Years [Editorial]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martucci, G., Landzberg, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.864751</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Not Just Big Kids: Closing Atrial Septal Defects in Adults Older Than 60 Years [Editorial]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal Defects: Echocardiographic and Functional Results in Patients Older Than 60 Years [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects is well established in children and adults and has been found to improve symptoms and positively influence right-heart remodeling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcome in adult patients older than 60 years.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> The study population comprised 96 patients in the age group of 60 to 84 years. Percutaneous closure was performed effectively in all patients. Functional capacity according to New York Heart Association functional class and peak oxygen uptake (VO<SUB>2</SUB>max) in the cardiopulmonary exercise testing improved significantly after atrial septal defects closure, especially in patients with a pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio &gt;2. Echocardiographic measurements of the right ventricular end-diastolic diameter showed a significant decrease. No device-associated complications were observed, but in 16 patients, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurred after device implantation.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Percutaneous atrial septal defects closure can be performed safely and with minimal risk even in elderly patients. They profit in terms of symptom reduction, improvement of exercise capacity, and right-heart remodeling.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jategaonkar, S., Scholtz, W., Schmidt, H., Horstkotte, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery, Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.814046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal Defects: Echocardiographic and Functional Results in Patients Older Than 60 Years [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/90?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immunohistochemical Characterization of Neotissues and Tissue Reactions to Septal Defect-Occlusion Devices [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/90?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> We sought to evaluate tissue reactions within and at the surface of devices for interventional therapy of septal defects and to identify antigen characteristics of neotissues.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Atrial or ventricular septal defect&ndash;occlusion devices (Amplatzer, n=7; Cardioseal/Starflex, n=3) were processed using a uniform protocol after surgical removal from humans (implantation time, 5 days to 4 years). Devices were fixed in formalin and embedded in methylmethacrylate. Serial sections were obtained by sectioning with a diamond cutter and grinding, thus saving the metal/tissue interface for histologic evaluation. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using conventional protocols. Superficial endothelial cells stained positive for von Willebrand factor. Within the newly formed tissues, fibroblast-like cells were identified with a time-dependent expression of smooth muscle cell maturation markers (smooth muscle actin, smooth muscle myosin, h-caldesmon, and desmin) beside extracellular matrix components. Neovascularization of the newly formed tissues was demonstrated with the typical immunohistochemical pattern of capillaries and small vessels. Inflammatory cells could be identified as macrophages (CD68+) and both T-type and B-type lymphocytes (CD3+, CD79+).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> This is the first presentation of results from serial immunohistochemical staining of a collection of explanted human septal-occlusion devices. A time-dependent maturation pattern of the fibroblast-like cells in the neotissues around the implants could be described. Neoendothelialization was seen in all specimens with implantation times of 10 weeks or more. The time course of neoendothelialization, as seen in our study, further supports the clinical practice of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy for 6 months after implantation. This time interval should be sufficient to prevent thromboembolic events due to thrombus formation at the foreign surface of cardiovascular implants.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foth, R., Quentin, T., Michel-Behnke, I., Vogt, M., Kriebel, T., Kreischer, A., Ruschewski, W., Paul, T., Sigler, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery, Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.810507</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immunohistochemical Characterization of Neotissues and Tissue Reactions to Septal Defect-Occlusion Devices [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/97?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coronary Spasm Preferentially Occurs at Branch Points: An Angiographic Comparison With Atherosclerotic Plaque [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/97?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Coronary spasm plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ischemic heart disease. However, similarities and differences between coronary spasm and atherosclerosis are not known. We examined the angiographic characteristics of coronary spasm in comparison with those of atherosclerosis.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Thirty-two left anterior descending arteries, 11 left circumflex arteries, and 23 right coronary arteries with spasm and atherosclerotic plaque were analyzed for the localization of spasm in comparison with that of plaque in 47 patients (38 men and 9 women, mean age 66.8&plusmn;10.3 yrs). Spasm predominantly occurred at the branch point as compared with plaque in each of the 3 arteries (76.7% versus 23.3%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; 72.7% versus 9.1%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.039; and 60.0% versus 10.0%, <I>P</I>=0.002, in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries, respectively). Spasm involved the proximal segment less frequently as compared with plaque in each of the 3 arteries (56.7% versus 93.3%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; 18.2% versus 81.8%, <I>P</I>=0.016; and 15.0% versus 75.0%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001 in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries, respectively). Most spasms occurred at the nonplaque site in each of the 3 arteries (73.3%, <I>P</I>=0.018; 100%, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; and 75.0%, <I>P</I>=0.041 in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries, respectively).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusion&mdash;</I></b> Coronary spasm preferentially occurred at branch points and nonplaque sites, whereas the atherosclerotic lesion was predominantly localized at the nonbranch points of the curved proximal segments. Coronary spasm may thus be a manifestation of a distinct type of arteriosclerosis different from the lipid-laden coronary atherosclerosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakagawa, H., Morikawa, Y., Mizuno, Y., Harada, E., Ito, T., Matsui, K., Saito, Y., Yasue, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute coronary syndromes, Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide, Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors, Other Vascular biology, Pathophysiology, Other arteriosclerosis, Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.803767</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coronary Spasm Preferentially Occurs at Branch Points: An Angiographic Comparison With Atherosclerotic Plaque [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors Portending Endoleak Formation After Thoracic Aortic Stent-Graft Repair of Complicated Aortic Dissection [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Endoleaks after stent-graft repair of aortic dissections are poorly understood but seem substantially different from those seen after aneurysm repair. We studied anatomic and clinical factors associated with endoleaks in patients who underwent stent-graft repair of complicated type B aortic dissections.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> From 2000 to 2007, 37 patients underwent stent-graft repair of acute (&le;14 days; n=23), subacute (15 to 90 days; n=10) or chronic (&gt;90 days; n=4) complicated type B aortic dissections using the Gore Thoracic Excluder (n=17) or TAG stent-grafts (n=20) under an investigator-sponsored protocol. Endoleaks were classified as imperfect proximal seal, flow through fenestrations or branches, or complex (both). Variables studied included coverage of the left subclavian artery, aortic curvature, completeness of proximal apposition, dissection chronicity, and device used. Endoleaks were found during follow-up (mean, 22 months) in 59% of patients, and they were associated with coverage of the left subclavian artery (complex, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001), small radius of curvature (type 1 and complex, <I>P</I>=0.05), and greatest length of unapposed proximal stent graft (complex, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001). During follow-up, 10 endoleaks resolved spontaneously, 6 required reintervention for false lumen dilatation, and 2 were stable without clinical consequences.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Endoleaks are common after stent-graft repair of aortic dissection and may lead to false lumen enlargement necessitating reintervention. Anatomic complexities such as acute aortic curvature and covered side branches were associated with endoleaks, illustrating the need for dissection-specific device development.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sze, D. Y., van den Bosch, M. A.A.J., Dake, M. D., Miller, D. C., Hofmann, L. V., Varghese, R., Malaisrie, S. C., van der Starre, P. J.A., Rosenberg, J., Mitchell, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Peripheral vascular disease, CV surgery: aortic and vascular disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.819722</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors Portending Endoleak Formation After Thoracic Aortic Stent-Graft Repair of Complicated Aortic Dissection [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>112</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Randomized Controlled Trial of Angiography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Directed Bare-Metal Coronary Stent Placement (The AVID Trial) [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> AVID (Angiography Versus Intravascular ultrasound-Directed stent placement) is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess the effect of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-directed stent placement on the 12-month rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR).</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> After elective coronary stent placement and an optimal angiographic result (&lt;10% stenosis), 800 patients were randomized to Angiography- or IVUS-directed therapy. Blinded IVUS was performed in the Angiography group without further therapy. In the IVUS group, IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement (&lt;10% area stenosis, apposition, and absence of dissection) were applied. Final minimum stent area was 6.90&plusmn;2.43 mm<sup>2</sup> in the Angiography group and 7.55&plusmn;2.82 mm<sup>2</sup> in the IVUS group (<I>P</I>=0.001). In the IVUS group, only 37% with inadequate expansion (&lt;90%) received further therapy. The 12-month TLR rate was 12.0% in the Angiography group and 8.1% in the IVUS group (<I>P</I>=0.08, 95% confidence level [CI], [&ndash;8.3% to 0.5%]). When vessels with a distal reference diameter &lt;2.5 mm by core laboratory angiography measurement were excluded from analysis, the 12-month TLR rate was 10.1% in the Angiography group and 4.3% in the IVUS group (<I>P</I>=0.01, 95% CI, [&ndash;10.6% to &ndash;1.2%]). With a prestent angiographic stenosis of &ge;70%, the TLR rate was lower in the IVUS group compared with the Angiography group (3.1% versus 14.2%; <I>P</I>=0.002; 95% CI, [&ndash;18.4% to &ndash;4.2%]).</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement results in larger acute stent dimensions without an increase in complications and a significantly lower 12-month TLR rate for vessels &ge;2.5 mm by angiography and for vessels with high-grade prestent stenosis. However, for the entire sample analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement does not significantly reduce the 12-month TLR rate when compared with stent placement guided by angiography alone. In addition, IVUS evaluation of adequate stent expansion is underutilized by experienced operators.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russo, R. J., Silva, P. D., Teirstein, P. S., Attubato, M. J., Davidson, C. J., DeFranco, A. C., Fitzgerald, P. J., Goldberg, S. L., Hermiller, J. B., Leon, M. B., Ling, F. S., Lucisano, J. E., Schatz, R. A., Wong, S. C., Weissman, N. J., Zientek, D. M., for the AVID Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC, Restenosis, Restenosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.778647</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Randomized Controlled Trial of Angiography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Directed Bare-Metal Coronary Stent Placement (The AVID Trial) [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>123</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retrograde Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion of the Coronary Arteries: Procedural Outcomes and Predictors of Success in Contemporary Practice [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Retrograde approach through collaterals has been introduced for percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary arteries. We investigated the safety and efficacy of retrograde approaches used for percutaneous recanalization of CTO in a consecutive series of patients.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> We studied 157 consecutive patients who underwent retrograde CTO recanalization between 2003 and 2008 at a single center. A total of 118 (75.2%) of these patients have had previously failed antegrade attempts. Septal, epicardial, and saphenous vein graft collaterals were used in 67.5%, 24.8%, and 7.6% of cases, respectively. Collateral channel was crossed by guide wire successfully in 115 (73.2%) cases, and the procedure was successful by retrograde approach in 103 (65.6%) cases. Collateral channels (CCs) were graded as follows: CC0, no continuous connection; CC1, continuous thread-like connection; and CC2, continuous, small sidebranch-like connection. CC1, collateral tortuosity &lt;90&deg;, and angle with recipient vessel &lt;90&deg; (<I>P</I>&lt;0.0001) were significant predictors of success. Epicardial channel use (<I>P</I>=0.01), CC0, corkscrew channel (<I>P</I>&lt;0.0001), angle with recipient vessel &gt;90&deg; (<I>P</I>=0.0007), and nonvisibility of connection with recipient vessel were found to be significant predictors of procedural failure. The CC dissection was observed in 6 patients, with 1 needing coil embolization and others who were managed conservatively. The major adverse cardiac events were low, with 1 coronary artery bypass graft, 1 Q-wave myocardial infarction, 5 non&ndash;Q-wave myocardial infarctions, and no deaths in this group of patients.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> The retrograde approach in CTO percutaneous coronary intervention is effective in recanalizing CTO. The success rate by retrograde approach was 65.6%, and final success was 85% in this group with acceptable overall adverse events. We have identified predictors of failure related to collateral morphology.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rathore, S., Katoh, O., Matsuo, H., Terashima, M., Tanaka, N., Kinoshita, Y., Kimura, M., Tsuchikane, E., Nasu, K., Ehara, M., Asakura, K., Asakura, Y., Suzuki, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chronic ischemic heart disease, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, Angiography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.838862</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retrograde Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion of the Coronary Arteries: Procedural Outcomes and Predictors of Success in Contemporary Practice [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/133?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frequency and Clinical Consequences Associated With Sidebranch Occlusion During Stent Implantation Using Zotarolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents [Original Articles]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/133?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><I>Background&mdash;</I></b> Myocardial infarction (MI) after drug-eluting stent placement has been associated with an unfavorable late prognosis. Although the etiology of periprocedural MI is multifactorial, sidebranch occlusion may be an important contributing factor. We sought to identify the incidence of sidebranch occlusion during zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) placement and to relate sidebranch occlusion to the occurrence of periprocedural MI.</p>
<p><b><I>Methods and Results&mdash;</I></b> Angiograms were reviewed from patients randomly assigned to treatment with a ZES (597 patients; 943 sidebranches) or a PES (619 patients; 977 sidebranches). Sidebranch occlusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 or 1. Sidebranch occlusion was correlated with frequency of MI, as assessed by the creatine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme. Sidebranch occlusion occurred less often after the first stent deployment in patients treated with ZES (2.2%) than in patients treated with PES (4.0%; <I>P</I>=0.032). A similar reduction in the frequency of sidebranch occlusion at any point during the procedure was found in patients treated with ZES (2.9% versus 4.8% in PES patients; <I>P</I>=0.042). Multivariable predictors of sidebranch occlusion included baseline sidebranch stenosis, complex lesion morphology, smaller baseline minimal lumen diameters, and the use of a PES. Of the 20 patients with MI within 30 days of the procedure, 30% had evidence of sidebranch occlusion during the stent procedure.</p>
<p><b><I>Conclusions&mdash;</I></b> Patients treated with ZES were less likely to develop sidebranch occlusion during stent placement than patients treated with PES. Less frequent sidebranch occlusion with ZES may have contributed to the lower frequency rates of periprocedural MI in this study.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Popma, J. J., Mauri, L., O'Shaughnessy, C., Overlie, P., McLaurin, B., Almonacid, A., Kirtane, A., Leon, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.832048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frequency and Clinical Consequences Associated With Sidebranch Occlusion During Stent Implantation Using Zotarolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents [Original Articles]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/140?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Masson, J.-B., Webb, J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Valvular heart disease, Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.837781</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation [Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>146</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery From the Left Ventricle [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliveira, E. C., Pereira, A. C. N., Ribeiro, A. L. P., Carneiro, J. G., Siqueira, M. H. A., Pauperio, H., Amaral, C. F. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC, CT and MRI]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.819227</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery From the Left Ventricle [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Setting of a Single Left Coronary Ostium [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></title>
<link>http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/2/149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, P. D., Bury, R. W., Brack, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:31:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Acute myocardial infarction, Cardiac development, Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents, CT and MRI]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.851642</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Setting of a Single Left Coronary Ostium [Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Heart Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images and Case Reports in Interventional Cardiology</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>